 | | Re: Posting Dates
|
| (...) It would help if the server could "nag" people if their auth response was never received. An e-mail reminder could help in case the original auth request was deleted or never delivered. I've always wondered ever since the auth system was put (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Posting Dates
|
| (...) ?? Wouldn't it show up in their mail on the day it actually got posted rather than the day it was sent, queued up and was intended to be posted? A mail interface person who didn't closely check the date on the mail, or a newsreader person (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Posting Dates
|
| (...) I view the dates differently. In the authentication scenario, the authorize date is the date when the poster made a conscious decision to share their message with the community, the message's birthday. The date they wrote and submitted the (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| (...) That point is the first purely market oriented post. Even if it's a direct reply or followup to a post... Bram's followup to his original post was market related, pure and simple, and nothing else. (...) I'm not. I saw a lot of whinging by you (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Posting Dates
|
| (...) Maybe that's the penalty you mention below? Someone who doesn't authorize a message right away runs the risk of having their message being not read as it gets inserted in it's proper place in line-perhaps after a week or so? Is that even (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
