 | | Re: Posting Dates (Was: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...))
|
| (...) It looks like you both did. Scott's message is dated 1-Feb, a couple of days following the previous message, although it showed up some 8 hours ago. If I look at the dates, you're the one holding the shovel. I thought this NNTP date (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| (...) Shouldn't that be "rucki"? XFUT: off-topic.pun, because this doesn't belong in admin.general. And if you disagree, I'm gonna go get mom! -- Tony Hafner www.hafhead.com (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| | | | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| Come on Lar, I think we can all see the difference between posting a message saying XX parts now in my brinklink store, and a link to an image that shows a valuable building technique which also states in the image (and not in the original posting) (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| (...) Yes, there should be little room for ruckusii (that's latin for more than one ruckus). (...) But this is the point: this incident aside, I support, encourage and wholeheartedly embrace policing (see rant before about community policing). My (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| (...) Be careful, as TC would say: "If I'm doing my duty and respectfully guide someone on something they post, and THEY or THEIR COHORTS cause a ruckus, oh well. That's THEIR problem (and that problem will be corrected too). There should be little (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
