 | | Re: Membership Math
|
| (...) I think a simple membership icon would be appropriate. But I am against public member ratings unless it were confined to that member's profile page. If people feel that they should be rated highly in order to be considered a "good" member this (...) (23 years ago, 7-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.finance)
| | | | | Re: Membership Math
|
| (...) I guess the impetus for me would be the ability to see who's who rather than who's respected. Used to be I could recognize maybe 70% of the names on Lugnet-- now it's not so easy. Only helps me insofar as I can say "Is this person a newbie?" (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.finance)
| | | | | Re: Membership Math
|
| Well said Kevin, it is just a pity nobody highlighted your message. ;) Scott A =+= Have you inspected Arthur’s Seat yet? (URL) reasonable man adapts himself to suit his environment. An unreasonable man persists in attempting to adapt his environment (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.finance)
| | | | | Re: Membership Math
|
| David, I can understand most of this, but why should it matter if a person chooses to be a member or not? Scott A =+= Have you inspected Arthur’s Seat yet? (URL) reasonable man adapts himself to suit his environment. An unreasonable man persists in (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.finance)
| | | | | Re: Membership Math
|
| (...) I assume you meant to ask me why it should matter for me to know: (...) As for why it should matter? It shouldn't. But I find it easier to know who I'm talking to. It may help me to decide whether or not I should reply, how I should reply, or (...) (23 years ago, 8-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.finance, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
