To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.databaseOpen lugnet.admin.database in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Database / 551
550  |  552
Subject: 
Re: Data Base Updates
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.database
Date: 
Thu, 13 Jan 2000 02:21:16 GMT
Viewed: 
1075 times
  
Todd Lehman wrote in message ...
> In lugnet.admin.database, Frank Filz writes:
> > 6093 Flying Ninja Fortress, 687 pcs (box (c) 1998 4111748)
> 
> Could you confirm (double-check) that it actually is 687 according to the • box,
> and not 688?  (My old data for this set from Jeff S said 688.  Might've
> originated originally from a catalog, but the box is more official.)


Definitely 687 on two boxes.

> > 1194 Classic Building Table Set, 400 pcs (box), 2 figs
> 
> Any other info on this one?  (year, theme/category, price?)


Price is $19.95 or $19.99 (should have written it down when I saw it in the
store today, I can't find the "value pack" label). I did find the box
bottom. Copyright 1999. Theme is Classic. The table is the same style as set
4217, but it is packaged in a box which is longer than the table, with the
parts beside the table.

> > I may have to dig around for some of these, so the weekend would be the
> > earliest I could get to them. From your notes on 3017 and 3019, it looks
> > like you prefer a scan of the front page of the instructions?
> 
> Yes, currently that's the desired "best" and cleanest photo for a set (for
> sets that have instructions) but ultimately the DB will also support scans
> of alternative models from the boxes, and alternative views from snippets
> of catalogs, etc...so that people can view each set multiple ways.


Scans of the cover of the instructions will definitely be easier to come by,
though for the Classic sets, I may need to take pictures of the boxes since
they don't have instructions per se.

Frank



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Data Base Updates
 
(...) Could you confirm (double-check) that it actually is 687 according to the box, and not 688? (My old data for this set from Jeff S said 688. Might've originated originally from a catalog, but the box is more official.) (...) But Outback wasn't (...) (27 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.admin.database)

7 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    
Active threads in Database

 
LUGNET Guide updates (Sun 8 Nov 2026)
5 hours ago

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR