 | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:FMEzxF.Au8@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) intended (...) leaks (...) lines (...) I'm with the second one completely, although it is fun to watch the rumours and "spy works" around..:-) Actually (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Maybe what we should do is this: I could print a list of all the sets and set numbers we know about, and send that to someone at LEGO, and ask them to send it back with any set numbers crossed out that they felt weren't appropriate to appear (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Dan Jezek
|
| | | | | | (...) I think you would be wasting your time there, Todd. I'm sure that TLC employees would rather spend their time by trying to make more money and by further juniorizing those sets and themes that are still decent rather than spending hours or (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire? —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | (...) So that's why no-one responded to my WTB request for 6500 :) -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | |
