Database : 466


Administrative / Database / 466	465 \| 467

Subject:	Re: Arctic is Town (was: Re: My Analysis of the 2000 Sets)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.general, lugnet.town, lugnet.admin.database
Date:	Wed, 10 Nov 1999 17:26:40 GMT
Viewed:	80 times

Todd Lehman wrote: <snipped well mapped out discussion of set numbering theory> > [...] > > Seriously though, was Futbol created because the soccer sets from last year > > were a sucess? I think so! > > I hope so!! OK, I have looked at the new catalog in some detail but I can't see where everybody is getting the label "Futbol" for these sets. I am obviously overlooking something...but I don't see it :) -- Thomas Main main@appstate.edu http://members.xoom.com/brickenplate/index.html

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Arctic is Town (was: Re: My Analysis of the 2000 Sets)
(...) year (...) Where did this come from? I haven't seen anything that says "Futbol" in the catalog, and frankly, I don't think Lego would be dumb enough to refer to the soccer sets this way in the US. It would create way to much confusion. Jeff (25 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.town, lugnet.admin.database)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Arctic is Town (was: Re: My Analysis of the 2000 Sets)
(...) Logically speaking, that conclusion doesn't follow.[1] Something being in 63xx-66xx means that it definitely is Town, but something not being 63xx-66xx doesn't necessarily mean that it's not Town. For example, 9 of the ~23 Ninja sets are in (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.town, lugnet.admin.database)

13 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Active threads in Database

	LUGNET Guide updates (Tue 26 Nov 2024) 8 hours ago

Custom Search