Subject:
|
Re: Castle missing from database
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Sun, 22 Aug 1999 03:48:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
526 times
|
| |
| |
Actually, upon closer inspection, could it be a store display catalog?
The dimensions would only be useful
to a store planning a display.
KL
Kevin Loch wrote:
>
> That looks alot like a catalog to me.
>
> KL
>
> John DiRienzo wrote:
> >
> > After checking this out a little further, I found out this was just an
> > idea for a model, not an actual set. Its very strange that there is a
> > number by the model (which appears to be a set number, but is not). I will
> > probably scan this and post it on my site soon, so you can see it. Its
> > interesting, anyway.
> >
> > --
> > Have fun!
> > John
> > AUCTION Page (More soon!)
> > http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/2-many-toys/
> > TRADE Page http://www114.pair.com/ig88/lego/index.htm
> > MOC,CA++++(6035)SW,TR,old(456)+++TO++PI,SP+DU--#+++++
> > ig88888888@stlnet.com & IG88888888 on AOL
> > Todd Lehman wrote in message <37b32bb3.69535210@lugnet.com>...
> > > In lugnet.admin.database, "John DiRienzo" <ig88888888@stlnet.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > The first Castle set was #0746 - it is white. Thought you'd like to know,
> > > > since its not listed.
> > >
> > > Do you have a picture of it anywhere? A name? A piece count? A year?
> > > Proof that it's a Castle set? (Almost all of the Castle sets are 6000-6099,
> > > and 0746 sounds like an old Samosonite-range number, not a Castle set.)
> > >
> > > --Todd
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: | | Re: Castle missing from database
|
| -- Have fun! John AUCTION Page (More soon!) (URL) Page (URL) & IG88888888 on AOL Kevin Loch wrote in message <37BF731D.7653@NOSPMkl.net>... (...) My first thought was I had lucked into an old catalog that revealed a bunch of unknown sets. However, (...) (25 years ago, 22-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | Re: Castle missing from database
|
| Kevin Loch wrote in message <37BF731D.7653@NOSPMkl.net>... (...) Kevin, Your suggestion made me think a little more, and upon further discussion, it is beginning to appear that you are right! From the latest conversations, we have concluded that it (...) (25 years ago, 27-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
Message is in Reply To:
10 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|