Subject:
|
Re: Castle missing from database
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Sun, 22 Aug 1999 03:31:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
254 times
|
| |
|
|
That looks alot like a catalog to me.
KL
John DiRienzo wrote:
>
> After checking this out a little further, I found out this was just an
> idea for a model, not an actual set. Its very strange that there is a
> number by the model (which appears to be a set number, but is not). I will
> probably scan this and post it on my site soon, so you can see it. Its
> interesting, anyway.
>
> --
> Have fun!
> John
> AUCTION Page (More soon!)
> http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/2-many-toys/
> TRADE Page http://www114.pair.com/ig88/lego/index.htm
> MOC,CA++++(6035)SW,TR,old(456)+++TO++PI,SP+DU--#+++++
> ig88888888@stlnet.com & IG88888888 on AOL
> Todd Lehman wrote in message <37b32bb3.69535210@lugnet.com>...
> > In lugnet.admin.database, "John DiRienzo" <ig88888888@stlnet.com> writes:
> >
> > > The first Castle set was #0746 - it is white. Thought you'd like to • know,
> > > since its not listed.
> >
> > Do you have a picture of it anywhere? A name? A piece count? A year?
> > Proof that it's a Castle set? (Almost all of the Castle sets are • 6000-6099,
> > and 0746 sounds like an old Samosonite-range number, not a Castle set.)
> >
> > --Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Castle missing from database
|
| After checking this out a little further, I found out this was just an idea for a model, not an actual set. Its very strange that there is a number by the model (which appears to be a set number, but is not). I will probably scan this and post it (...) (25 years ago, 21-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
