 | | Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project) —Todd Lehman
| | | | This seems like it is reaching critical mass (a good thing) and perhaps at this point a dedicated newsgroup should be created for this (i.e., efforts to standardize parts nomenclature). How does lugnet.db.brictionary sound? I wouldn't quite put it (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project) —Steve Bliss
| | | | | (...) Sounds good. Right place in the hierarchy. (...) And it's not actually part names, but a parts identification database, right? Having standard/prefered names is good, but it's the pictures (and maybe schematics) that actually identify the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project) —Jim Hughes
| | | | | | (...) Steve, I totally agree what is needed is a complete classification/taxonomy system so you can find a part. The naming component is useful and interesting but this project should be a parts database not just a name database. If the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | (canceled) —Steve Bliss
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project) —Steve Bliss
| | | | | | | (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project) —Tore Eriksson
| | | | | | | Hehe, I found you! 8-) /Tore (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project) —Steve Bliss
| | | | | | | (...) I actually had something to say in reply to Jim's message, but I posted it incorrectly once (defaulted the Newsgroup field), so I canceled and reposted, but didn't paste in the earlier text. Oh, well. Steve (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project) —Adam Howard
| | | | | | | What's this all about? You guys playing hide and seek in here? Adam Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3786467b.729193...net.com... (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Newsgroup for this (was Re: The Bricktionary project) —Todd Lehman
| | | | | | (...) Right. Identification and reference and browsing and all that. Massively cross-referenced within itself and to/from set inventories, MOC's, and the marketplace. So it's really a sub-database of the larger database. The "Brictionary" part is (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Picture references —Mark Koeberl
| | | | | (...) Not to overwhelm kl.net, but if a piece can be indentified in an old manual that has been scanned maybe a DB field could mention that. Doesn't have to be a direct link, but it might be a good common reference point. Mark (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
