Database : 281


Administrative / Database / 281	280 \| 282

Subject:	Re: How complete R U?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.database
Date:	Tue, 18 May 1999 21:51:27 GMT
Viewed:	85 times

> 1692 isn't, but 1694 is. Is there a third Galactic Scout set or is that > a typo? Sorry, my mistake :-) Huw

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: How complete R U?
(...) 1692 isn't, but 1694 is. Is there a third Galactic Scout set or is that a typo? --Todd (26 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.database)

13 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Active threads in Database

	LUGNET Guide updates (Sun 24 Nov 2024) 23 hours ago

Custom Search