 | | Re: Name for Set 10019
|
| (...) hmmm... that conflicts with the name from lego.com, which does say RBR... I _think_ the name on the box is the name we should use, but I'm not sure... anyone else have an opinion here? (23 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | Re: Name for Set 10019
|
| (...) I'd prefer the box name. If we used Tantive IV, we can put RBR in curly quotes for the time being. (I'd put the note in 'notes', but then it won't come up in a search.) how does that sound? -Suz (23 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | Re: Name for Set 10019
|
| (...) Sounds like a plan! Conversely if for whatever reason the name chosen (or switched to later) is RBR, I would advocate similarly putting Tantive IV in curlies... (23 years ago, 24-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | Re: Name for Set 10019
|
| (...) Ya, the box name is the most official form of the name. Names from S@H are catalog names, and they're not always correct. Let's put Tantive IV in the name field (with a TM if it's there on the box) and include Rebel Blockade Runner in curlies (...) (23 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | Alternate Set Names [was Re: Name for Set 10019]
|
| (...) Then something similar should be done for set 1355? Every box I've ever seen for it says "Temple of Gloom", but for the past several catalogs (and, I see, at shop.lego.com) S@H has called it "Temple Escape Studio" (you've got to wonder if (...) (23 years ago, 25-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
| |
