| | Re: new set number for item 1181
|
|
(...) 1266 exists... am i missing something? (24 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | new set number for item 1181
|
|
Reference: (URL) the reference above for info I have provided there. The copies I have of set 1266 were purchased approx. 10 weeks ago. Have not been able to locate additional copies. __Kevin Salm__ (24 years ago, 29-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: McDonalds 1999 promo sets in set reference ?
|
|
(...) FYI I did type in 1 through 8 and expected to see the latest McD promo's. After all, that is the most obvious number on there. Just because it's a single digit does not take away from it's significance as a set identifier. KL (24 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: McDonalds 1999 promo sets in set reference ?
|
|
(...) Yup, I think it's weird too. (...) I think they're also that. :-) Remember the SHELL promo sets from 1998? They had both low-numbered SHELL numbers (1-10 or something like that) and 4-digit LEGO set numbers on the instructions. For example, (...) (24 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: McDonalds 1999 promo sets in set reference ?
|
|
while I agree that the numbers don't seem quite right, I don't think it really matters... my reasoning is this: The numbers are entered in the DB only so people can find the sets they're looking for. If I have a box with 8448 on it, I'd never find (...) (24 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: McDonalds 1999 promo sets in set reference ?
|
|
(...) (ok, the velveeta one has "set no 1" writen all over it, but you get my point) (24 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: McDonalds 1999 promo sets in set reference ?
|
|
(...) I guess it's just weird that the numbers arn't sequential or following some sort of pattern... you know? besides, if they just scavenged for some empty set numbers, that implys they have a list of available numbers somewhere ;) I don't know, (...) (24 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: McDonalds 1999 promo sets in set reference ?
|
|
(...) One encouraging thing is that most of those 8 numbers don't seem to have collisions with other sets. (But the DUPLO area of the sets DB is still kinda sparse, and that's where many of the low numbers hang out, so there could be collisions (...) (24 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.promo, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: McDonalds 1999 promo sets in set reference ?
|
|
(...) Just wondering how we know that's a set number, and not some other random number... normally it's quite apparent... not stealthy... I'm (personally) not 100% sure :/ (24 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.promo, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: McDonalds 1999 promo sets in set reference ?
|
|
OK, do we have enough concensus to put them in the set reference now ? Ray (...) (24 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: McDonalds 1999 promo sets in set reference ?
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G1K6xG.HpK@lugnet.com... (...) That was my conclusion also. (...) Single unit Huw (24 years ago, 28-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: McDonalds 1999 promo sets in set reference ?
|
|
(...) Ahh, good show! OK, so the last 7 digits then must be the standard LEGO 7-digit product number thingum? (Do the last 7 digits occur as a single unit or are they separated by periods or commas? Just curious; IIRC, LEGO has done it both ways.) (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: McDonalds 1999 promo sets in set reference ?
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G1IGBA.1rJ@lugnet.com... (...) numbers (...) I have used those numbers at Brickset. They are the first 4 digits of a 4+7 number printed on the top left of each sheet. #8 = 2025 (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Are there plans to link up the inventories of sets to the set Guide?
|
|
I am asking because I have a few sets I wanted to check.. (+some that I could provide inventories for..(mainly 1999/2000 sets though :- ( ) I find it eaiser to search for the set in the set guide's taxonimy than in the inventories one. (The (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: McDonalds 1999 promo sets in set reference ?
|
|
(...) I can't find the polybag for #8, but I did find the instruction sheet. Based on comparing the other sheets and polybags, I think the number is also coded on the instruction sheet. So... 2025 - McD's 1999 promo set #8 Ray (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: McDonalds 1999 promo sets in set reference ?
|
|
(...) Neat-o! Anyone know how "official" those numbers are? Can anyone confirm them or 'splain what part of the coding contained them? Anyone know what #8 says? It's encouraging that none of the numbers shown above have been used before for sets (to (...) (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.promo)
|
|
| | Re: CSV delimiters
|
|
(...) Dang. THAT is a very important piece of info -- thanks! OK... Are there any popular programs out there (on the level of Excel, etc.) which only handle CSV text and don't handle tab-delimited text data? --Todd (24 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
|
| | Re: CSV delimiters
|
|
Todd Lehman skrev i meddelandet ... (...) I see in the thread that you've got most of the answers you need, but there is at least one complication in the Windows world (if you ever get files from that): The MS programs (and many others too, as (...) (24 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
|
| | Re: CSV delimiters
|
|
(...) Aha! Excellent. Those docs sound well thought out. Hmm, that reminds me... Duh, this is prolly a common Perl thing. I bet Freidl[1] as some stuff on CSV? Lessee... <dig dig dig> Ahh, here we go: pp. 204-208, 227, 231, 290. And (haha!) it even (...) (24 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|
|
| | Re: CSV delimiters
|
|
Maybe this will also be helpful. It's not exactly a standard, but it is IEEE. :) (URL) (24 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish)
|