 | | Re: A database question
|
|
(...) But writing a function is MUCH more flexible than the built-in export facility. PLUS you can write it such that you do not have to do anything but press a button to get this file generated, MUCH nicer, IMHO (or perhaps I'm just biased because (...) (26 years ago, 7-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Updatezilla
|
|
(...) I thought hork meant to toss your cookies? :) From Tom McDonald Anti-spam block in place. (URL) what you can, but behave yourself. We'll have more, right after this. (26 years ago, 2-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: A Technic set DB outline
|
|
(...) That sounds about right. (I'm on trial for this, right?) September-October 1995 was when those discussions were going on that resulted in the FLG being created... At least I listed to Joshua/wisdom and used "series" instead of "sub-theme." :) (...) (26 years ago, 2-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: A Technic set DB outline
|
|
(...) I dunno. This comment looks like it took place sometime around Sept. '95, and Deja News finds references to "sub-theme" and "subtheme" as far back as April '95 -- and Deja News doesn't go back much further than that. So I don't think Todd's to (...) (26 years ago, 2-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: A Technic set DB outline
|
|
(...) 'Subtheme' was a term you suggested back in the days when Fibblesnork was more of a living entity, and you suggested that some terminology be laid out. It's the one that took off after that discussion. I don't think it was so much a case of "I (...) (26 years ago, 2-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
