 | | Re: Semi-ADMIN: Pause Train Reference Improvement Work in Good Shape
|
|
(...) If we go for more groups (I prefer fewer, personally, as I really did visit this already and arrived at fewer after quite some thought -- but do not by that token mean to imply I'm not open to the suggestion), I'm actually warming to (...) (26 years ago, 28-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 12V train early 70th
|
|
(...) In another thread we're talking about not confusing the mundanes. If I were a mundane I would NOT know that there were three voltages and it would be best if there were a way that selecting trains returned all trains regardless of voltage. (...) (26 years ago, 28-Mar-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Semi-ADMIN: Pause Train Reference Improvement Work in Good Shape
|
|
(...) I don't care EXACTLY about the names either, but we need about 2 more categories than we have now. Name them for the mundanes if you must. However I'd say that "Equipment" OR "maintenance of way" are not at all technical to the point of being (...) (26 years ago, 28-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Semi-ADMIN: Pause Train Reference Improvement Work in Good Shape
|
|
(...) I'm not (nor do I probably want to spend the time to become) knowledgeable enough about LEGO Trains and train terminology in general to have an opinion here that really is worth any weight, but generally I fall on the side of the fence that (...) (26 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Semi-ADMIN: Pause Train Reference Improvement Work in Good Shape
|
|
(...) I didn't put that part in the list of things to do automatically in the cron job because I didn't realize that anyone would be going ahead and reorganizing the train stuff. Not complaining, though! Very happy with the changes you've made! Just (...) (26 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
