 | | 1389 Onepu (McDonald's Promotional Bionicle Set)
|
|
Here's an inventory of the 1389 McDonald's Promotional Bionicle set using Peeron numbers and names. This was done from a unopened package so I think I got everything correct. The only problem is I'm not a Technic OR Bionicle person so I had no idea (...) (23 years ago, 8-Sep-01, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: box front picture for 4158
|
|
(...) We prefer jpeg images. We don't have a special size requirement, but some files can be as big as 100k. It really depends upon the quality of the scan and the amount of details in the image. Send us the biggest file that's convenient for you. (...) (23 years ago, 6-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | box front picture for 4158
|
|
I picked up several copies of 4158 yesterday. This set is missing the picture in the lugnet guide. I just dropped the box on my scanner and scanned the box front. What size and image type do you want ? Who do I send it to ? Ray (23 years ago, 6-Sep-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | small error in the lugnet database
|
|
set 1491 is listed as crusaders. It should be listed under black knights since both minifigures are from that theme. (23 years ago, 1-Sep-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: What should an inventory include?
|
|
Just an add-on question to the previous one: Is there any reason that the LUGNET set guide does not link to any inventories? I'm a bit biased towards the Peeron inventories simply because they seem to be the most up-to-date and best maintained (as (...) (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Database Piece Count
|
|
(...) This could be a zen-ish question, but do you mean inaccurate, or insufficiently precise? I think that there are situations where knowing that something is 800 +/- 100 is very useful in the general case (as long as it's ACCURATE, that is, as (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Database Piece Count
|
|
(...) I may be wrong, but methinks the only reason you jumped in here in the first place was because you thought it would make you look cool to talk about it because you've got special stuff set up for you and other people don't, and because you (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Database Piece Count
|
|
(...) I agree, and more importantly, it gives things a higher probability of being double-checked, since everything is more visible, which is one of the reasons this newsgroup exists. A real ticket system with groupware stuff would be much better, (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Database Piece Count
|
|
(...) Dan doesn't need an unsolicited lecture about this from the sidelines. (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Database Piece Count
|
|
(...) It wouldn't work. It would get blocked. (...) Actually there are lots and lots of them, and there have been since 1994, but they tend not to stay up for very long, or have access restrictions, or aren't very flexible. (...) I get bcc'd on (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Database Piece Count
|
|
(...) No, you're the only one using it. A couple of years ago it was used by ldraw.org -- I wrote a simple remailer for Terry Keller to use for parts voting when the one he had been using at some other site suddenly went dead. I took that and (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Database Piece Count
|
|
(...) That's always been my philosophy as well. (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Database Piece Count
|
|
(...) Kyle, I totally agree and always hoped to have something like this in place...never got around to it...it's a big task, but as Larry pointed out, it could be done in smaller steps. (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: adding minitalia to set ref
|
|
(...) Some weeks, neither do I! I have no idea where I am going to be next week yet..., should have said "this weekend", and I will try to remember on my own. 40% chance of that working... (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: adding minitalia to set ref
|
|
(...) Sure, but I don't have your schedule handy ;) (...) I don't know the particular distinction other than on the boxes for the system ones, it says system underneath and the others don't.. Themes aren't my specialty. (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: adding minitalia to set ref
|
|
(...) Ah, ok, I didn't cotton to that. (...) Ask me next week when I am home again. (...) I am pretty sure one that I have is 31 but it seems like I have a different one than 30, that one doesn't look familiar. Are the categories LEGO > Minitalia (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: adding minitalia to set ref
|
|
It's not my auction, but here you go, I don't understand why you want the url though... I already added the sets? (URL) number boats do you have, the numbers should be on the side... I added a couple today, 30 and 31. Pictures would be great :) (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Database Piece Count
|
|
(...) True, but... (...) Phase 2! In phase one, hang it where I suggested because it means NO, ZIP, NADA, ZERO change to LUGNET code. Let the heavy users start using it and work the bugs out and if it looks good, THEN lobby to get the template (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: adding minitalia to set ref
|
|
In lugnet.admin.database, Jennifer L. Boger writes: I have 2 minitalia boats, with boxes, one still MIB. My scanner is broke but I can take pics on a white background if that would help. Jen, what was the URL for that auction, I can see if it is for (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Database Piece Count
|
|
(...) But if I follow this correctly, the only "link" to submitting info to the Guide will be on this page: (URL) me that still falls into the category of "out-of-the-way". I don't imagine the majority of LUGNET users venture into the .admin (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
