 | | Re: Custom Created Set Reference
|
|
(...) I didn't say they were the same as clones, I said I disagreed with it almost as much :) (...) ok, it fits in the purpose, but where's the line drawn? Is a MOC not a set if I don't sell it? What if I draw up plans for it and give them away for (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Custom Created Set Reference
|
|
(...) I think there's a difference between a clone data base and a data base of custom sets. To quote from the Lugnet plan (from the purpose of Lugnet): (...) Hmm, sounds like a data base of fan created custom sets fits in that purpose. Should it be (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Custom Created Set Reference
|
|
I'm certainly not Todd, but I disagree with this almost as much as I disagreed with LUGNET hosting a clone set DB. Custom sets are nice, and I even own some, but I don't think this is the place, imho. Not wanting to start a debate, just expressing (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Custom Created Set Reference
|
|
Hello Todd, I've noticed that an increasingly number of AFOL's begin to offer custom created "to be build" sets to our Lego community. More and more of these sets started to emerge lately, and since most of them are realy impressive, I propose to (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Contents of 3033
|
|
Eric Harshbarger also has a nice table of the piece distribution on his website: (URL) has a table of #2494 (Purple Bucket) Bryan Beckwith "Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message news:GAy07x.HnD@lugnet.com... (...) tub. (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.loc.au)
|
