 | | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) The display of the lists on every set lookup was the number two bottleneck in the webserver's CPU load. --Todd (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) :-( You know more about LUGNET server load than I do, but is it really that much bandwidth to load some extra text? Not to sound negative. . .but seeing this a few minutes ago just depressed me. The utility of the LUGNET database has just (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Member details in set database moved to subpages
|
|
(...) I don't like it either, especially when it shows up right in your face on a set DB page. For reasons of server load and the above, I've moved the notes and buy/sell/own listings to subpages that you can click up if you want to see them. It (...) (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Some data on set 2_7
|
|
(...) I just noticed that set 2_7 has been updated with a 149 piece count from the box of set 105, which directly contradicts the 184 piece count from an actual set #2 box. (24 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | 1356 update
|
|
I bought myself a handful of small sets at TRU today, and have found data for one of them is missing from the database. So here's an update: 1356 Stunt Man Catapult - 27 pcs - 2 minifigs - $4.99 at TRU (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Brickset vs. Lugnet (Was Re: New Scala sets)
|
|
Frank Filz <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3A99D9CF.CB7D65...ing.com... (...) Todd may have a problem using Brickset data/images but personally I am happy for him and the other contributers to do so. (...) Unfortunately Todd and I (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: New Scala sets
|
|
(...) willing to "borrow" pictures from Brickset). (...) I wish we could see a merging of the data from Brickshelf and Lugnet. Lugnet in general has a better engine, but Brickset is definitely more complete in many areas. Frank (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.scala, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Basic set #4219 {Extra Bricks}
|
|
Basic set #4219 is in the database, but does not have a piece count. It contains 288 pieces. Martin (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: New Scala sets
|
|
(...) Hi Frank, no more need to use your scanner as I also got a Belville set this weekend and uploaded the new sets to www.brickset.com . Simply use the direct link if you only need the new Scala images: (URL) entire 2001 section is constantly (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.scala, lugnet.admin.database)
|
