|
|
 | | Re: 6557 LEGOfest offer
|
| (...) Yep, I wasn't about to fry him - no biggie. Richard (26 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.council)
| | | | | Re: 6557 LEGOfest offer
|
| I've no problem with this. I'm sure all Steve has done is click "reply to group" rather than "reply to sender"... a mistake I make quite often. Scott A (26 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.council)
| | | | | Re: 6557 LEGOfest offer
|
| (...) Hi Steve, I'm not jumping on your back, but this might have been better as a private email. I agree that it is a bit confusing because in lugnet.loc.uk we do discuss inter-uk trades and sales, but there the implication is that it is a UK only (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.council)
| | | | | Re: Please, just end the entire thing! ( was: Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?)
|
| (...) Hmm. Erin, while I can understand some frustration about vast threads of controversy, it's relevant to note that this conversation is happening exactly where it's supposed to: lugnet.OFF-TOPIC.debate (emphasis mine). Quoting relevant text: (...) (26 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.council)
| | | | | Re: Is a FUT .market.auction okay?
|
| (...) I would tend to think that if they're looking for an item at a certain price, they will not be terribly interested in an auction. If you're running a private auction (automated or not), I would contact the interested party and indicate that (...) (26 years ago, 25-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.council)
|
|
