 | | Re: Another missing message (was Re: Posts expiring?)
|
| (...) I wonder that, too. According to the articles, headers, it was posted via NNTP over TCP/IP using an NNTP client called Forte, rather than generated via script on the server via internal article injection like the 1/2 articles were. There's (...) (3 months ago, 10-Jun-26, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Another missing message (was Re: Posts expiring?)
|
| (...) Huh. I wonder why that message 37 got an Expires header, but no others? Copy/paste remnant?? (...) I'm not sure why, but I am pretty sure you did it on purpose: https://news.lugnet....eral/?n=38 :-) (...) Yeah, they do break the pattern, don't (...) (3 months ago, 10-Jun-26, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Another missing message (was Re: Posts expiring?)
|
| (...) Thank you, Nathan! I think we have our smoking gun. Inside an older snapshot, I just did this: $ cd news/art/lugnet/announce $ grep ^Expires: * 1:Expires: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT 2:Expires: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 00:00:00 GMT 37:Expires: Fri, 1 (...) (3 months ago, 10-Jun-26, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Another missing message (was Re: Posts expiring?)
|
| (...) Yes, thank you! Although I'm not sure we would have missed that one from /disney… ;-) (3 months ago, 10-Jun-26, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Posts expiring?
|
| (...) Funny, I had just finished reading the first big round of discussion on this (Jan '99). At the time the major issue was cross-posting; RTL wasn't yet overtaken by spam, but mostly just auction postings and clueless newbies (the regulars all (...) (3 months ago, 10-Jun-26, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
