|
 | | Re: BrickOS Patches and Development
|
| Now for Bibo.... I have merged these patch rollup collections with Bibo (where appropriate) and have posted the resulting diff files to (URL) of this follows the pattern of the previous patch rollup collection for BrickOS, with the following notes: (...) (18 years ago, 19-Apr-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|   rcx (score: 0.507) |
|
| |
|   rcx (score: 0.507) |
|
 | | RTL query
|
| I was looking up Shiri Dori today, partly because I was bored and partly because hers was a name that always used to pop up and doesn't now. Anyway.... one thing that I came across was RTL. My understanding was that it was basically a predecesor to (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.faq)
| |
|   communication (score: 0.507) |
|
| |
|   rcx (score: 0.507) |
|
| |
|   communication (score: 0.506) |
|
| |
|   rcx (score: 0.506) |
|
| |
|   rcx (score: 0.506) |
|
| |
|   communication (score: 0.506) |
|
| |
|   rcx (score: 0.506) |
|
| |
|   communication (score: 0.506) |
|
| |
|   rcx (score: 0.506) |
|
 | | Re: Autonomous Robot
|
| in article 399399F2.ADECFC6D@airmail.net, Steve Baker at lego-robotics@crynwr.com wrote on 8/10/00 11:15 PM: (...) That's the sort of thing I've been imagining. JP Brown's Laser Target invention (URL) be generalized up to something involving a paper (...) (26 years ago, 11-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|   rcx, communication (score: 0.506) |
|
 | | Re: IR Sensitivity - Was: 1.5/2.0 infrared problem
|
| (...) Hello Mark, Thanks for your answer, this will keep me from dismantling once again my RCXs ! So it seems that LEGO modified RCX2.0 to get better compatibility with Spybots/Manas. Now a question remains, why did they increased carrier frequency (...) (23 years ago, 23-Oct-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|   communication (score: 0.506) |
|
| |
|   rcx (score: 0.506) |
|
 | | Re: BrickOS Patches and Development
|
| (...) Case in point: when I first started on this post some weeks(!) ago, hoenicke.ath.cx wasn't responding. (...) And it's not getting easier if we've collected different sets of patches and then make further changes based on those... So yeah, we (...) (18 years ago, 31-Mar-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|   rcx (score: 0.505) |
|
 | | Signalling and controlling rcx
|
| Hi there, This is actually a request for information. I am currently trying to control my RCX through the use of communication from my PC. The idea is that through some method I can type things into the computer and this will control the rcx via the (...) (26 years ago, 31-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|   rcx, communication (score: 0.505) |
|
 | | LNP Addressing Scheme
|
| Hi All, I've been playing around with LNP's logical layer and now want to use the addressing layer to enable communication with specific destination hosts (and ports) for my project: (URL) having a difficulty though. I understand that by changing (...) (26 years ago, 5-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|   rcx, communication (score: 0.504) |
|
 | | Re: C$
|
| (...) Has this question been answered? Will robots be allowed to not make a play? (unintentionally or otherwise) And, has a method of communication been decided upon? (IR or sensor toggle) (23 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|   communication (score: 0.504) |
|
 | | Re: questions, comments, and suggestions
|
| (...) RCX_COMPILER is an internal gcc/egcs define, when patched correctly to support RCX interrupts. This is still used and useful, as it saves only the required registers, unlike the HANDLER_WRAPPER macro, which saves all volatile registers. (...) (...) (26 years ago, 1-Aug-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|   rcx, communication (score: 0.504) |
|
| |
|   rcx (score: 0.504) |