LUGNET News : Search Results: post frequency


Search Results: post frequency

Results 481 – 500 of about 37000.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) If I was a .cad I wouldn't want an analysis of it either. ;-) -- Terry K -- (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.534)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) It would be interesting to update last years list, so a comparision between now and last year can be made. -- Terry K -- (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.534)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) :p I've been good lately, very few low-content posts. I just put the puns in the useful postings... Steve (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.534)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) ::homer voice:: woohoo! I'm a noisemaker! lol. Thanx for the new list, dan. -Jay (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.534)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) Does this include the nightly activity posts under Todd's name? Still, to be #3.... I'd better not let my boss see that... Frank (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.534)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) Wow! I thought I'd have many more pots than this, but once I factor in the 4 months I was offline this number makes a bit more sense. Still....enough slacking off, I'm WAY behind Lar this year. ;) -Dave (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.534)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
Dan Boger <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:GpBx9D.CMy@lugnet.com... (...) yesterday... (...) Yikes!!! I never would have thought to get into the 200s let alone this. Cool. Gary (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.534)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) yup, just counting X-Real-Life-Name headers. Dan (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.534)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:GpBx9D.CMy@lugnet.com... (...) yesterday... (...) <snip> (...) <snip> (...) <snip> In a way this is kinda deceptive because I used Ken's name for a bit after he died untill I was able to get mine (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.534)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) that's OK. I posted 2 times. Ya. Right. James P (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.534)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
AHHHH! I didn't know I posted THAT much! I'm 13th! Josh (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.534)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) Perhaps you should spend more money on pots than Lego 8?) Unless it was some other kind of pot you're talking about 8?/ ROSCO FUT .o-t.fun (23 years ago, 5-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

frequency
(score: 1.534)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) POSTS!!! LOL! Damned sticking keyboard. I'll just have to replace it soon. Wouldn't mind the oter thing you're referring to though. ;) -Dave (23 years ago, 5-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

frequency
(score: 1.534)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) Yow. I've been missing for six months and I'm _still_ on this list? The rest of y'all are all slack! :) -JDF [As much testing to see if I've got posting set up right on this box as I am making fun of y'all's slack. :) ] (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.533)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) <snipped LAST year's list> (...) For THIS year's list, compiled by Dan Boger (not cumulative, but only for 2001), see (URL) C. (23 years ago, 12-Jan-02, to lugnet.people)

frequency
(score: 1.533)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Benjamin Medinets writes: <huge snip> (...) as it was pointed out by others, that was last years list (from 2000). But please try to trim the quotes - there was no need to quote 2056 lines just to add 2 lines, right? :) Dan (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.532)

		Re: QUICK, my scientist need exotic weapons
(...) Hope this isn't too late, but I'll throw in my two bits: My first two are based on some real-life experimental weapons I've always thought were cool: 1. the ION GUN. ----- This gun shoots a steady stream of ionized particles into a stationary (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jan-02, to lugnet.gaming)

frequency
(score: 1.531)

		Re: Parts Tracker update frequency
(...) Thanks for the update, Steve I think I'd prefer the "volume method", though it's not something I'd die for 8?) ROSCO (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

frequency
(score: 1.530)

		Re: Parts Tracker update frequency
Hello (...) advantages, (...) Yes.. i would agree to this method too... Sounds better to me! Play well Carsten (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

frequency
(score: 1.530)

		Re: Parts Tracker update frequency
(...) I prefer a regular update, on a month base or so. This has some advantages, as some parts will be faster released than on a volume base, and the files to download will be also less large than on a volume base. Anyhow, every method has his pro (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

frequency
(score: 1.530)

More: Next Page >>