Results 201 – 220 of about 37000.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
| |
|  
post
(score: 0.613)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.612)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.612)
|
|
 | | Squeezing out the last few secrets of the LEGO Genome...
|
| I like the word "Genome"... it has to do with mapping out the entire genetic squence of an organism's heredetary information... or in this case the entire history of LEGO... Well I am now close to "the final frontier" in finding all the LEGO sets (...) (12 years ago, 13-Feb-14, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.612)
|
|
| | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
| (...) Happy New Year, Janey... Sorry if my answer was a bit cryptic there! What I am trying to say is that if the new policy means that people act more in accordance with the ToS than they have in the recent past, it may well be that no time outs (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.terms, FTX)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.612)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.610)
|
|
| | Re: Exploring a new track radius
|
| (...) There are a few inherent issues with "flex track". Tying it into the current system, safety since metal rails can be sharp, Transporting the segments exc. Making just the ties was my initial idea too (apparently for other people as well) but (...) (13 years ago, 20-Jan-14, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.610)
|
|
| | Re: Whatever happened...
|
| (...) Oh, I just hate it when Calum's right about stuff. Prolly almost as much as he hates it when I'm right. Fortunately for me, there's a frequency difference there. :) (...) Me either. (URL) That wiki scares me, it takes obsession to a Whole New (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.610)
|
|
| | Re: Whatever happened...
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang wrote: [ ... snipped ... ] (...) Treading ever so lightly into rtl since it appears to be the only sane part of LUGNET right now. I would wager there are more than a few people at LEGO who are already fed up (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.610)
|
|
| | Re: December Christmas Special meal
|
| (...) You are clearly in the running with the post to which I am replying, as well as the post to which I was previously replying. Imprecise referents are to be abhorred. However, since it is Christmas(1), I will answer your query, however malformed (...) (13 years ago, 25-Dec-13, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.610)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.609)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.609)
|
|
| | Re: December Christmas Special meal
|
| (...) Nearly, but no, but thanks for playing! The "this" refers to your post, not mine. So, in essence, the question still stands to you about your post. But I surmise that you already knew that. JOHN (13 years ago, 23-Dec-13, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.609)
|
|
| | Re: Just say no
|
| (...) Which is what I favor. And what I think Buckley favors too, although it would surely be harder to convince you of that than me. He's a knee jerk old school conservative but even stopped clocks are right twice a day (well, once a day if they're (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.609)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.608)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.608)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.608)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.607)
|
|
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.607)
|
|
| | Re: Rolling ball clock revisited
|
| (...) I love it! Very nicely done! It was interesting to read this bit off your website-- " The problem should have been very simple: each minute, start the elevator until a ball is detected by one sensor. Unfortunately, my first try over a several (...) (22 years ago, 7-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics, FTX)
| |
|
frequency
(score: 0.607)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
