LUGNET News : Search Results: post frequency


Search Results: post frequency

Results 181 – 200 of about 37000.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) nono, my mistake. should have looked at the numbers before posting. working on a repost. :/ Dan (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) Hmmm ... last year we had 31 people with over a thousand posts, and this year only 9. Plus the overall number has gone down - any ideas what this is attributed to? The newness of Lugnet wearing off? I wonder if the hits are higher than last (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) 8th place!?!?! Oh holy cripes...Jill's gonna' kill me! I really had NO idea I posted here quite this often...I assume that this list isn't filtered for crossposts, right? So there's a CHANCE that I'm at least out of the top ten? GEEZ! Matt (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) Most likely it's due to the new posting verification rules. It's been discussed that overall posting is significantly down since the email verification kicked in. Adrian (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) Todd's list last year was a list for all posts since September 1998, IIRC. I may be slacking, but there's no way I posted half as much this year as last. But I think you're right in that some of the "newness" has faded. As far as MOC's are (...) (23 years ago, 2-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) yesterday... (...) Thanks Dan! (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) Ouch. I guess that's the result of keeping quiet and laying low for such a long time. So... Hi Frank, nice to meet'cha! I've been around for a pretty long time, though at present I'm going through a bit of a "dim age". Not dark, but not very (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) If I was a .cad I wouldn't want an analysis of it either. ;-) -- Terry K -- (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) It would be interesting to update last years list, so a comparision between now and last year can be made. -- Terry K -- (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) :p I've been good lately, very few low-content posts. I just put the puns in the useful postings... Steve (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) Does this include the nightly activity posts under Todd's name? Still, to be #3.... I'd better not let my boss see that... Frank (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) Wow! I thought I'd have many more pots than this, but once I factor in the 4 months I was offline this number makes a bit more sense. Still....enough slacking off, I'm WAY behind Lar this year. ;) -Dave (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
Dan Boger <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:GpBx9D.CMy@lugnet.com... (...) yesterday... (...) Yikes!!! I never would have thought to get into the 200s let alone this. Cool. Gary (23 years ago, 4-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) yup, just counting X-Real-Life-Name headers. Dan (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) Perhaps you should spend more money on pots than Lego 8?) Unless it was some other kind of pot you're talking about 8?/ ROSCO FUT .o-t.fun (23 years ago, 5-Jan-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.fun)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) POSTS!!! LOL! Damned sticking keyboard. I'll just have to replace it soon. Wouldn't mind the oter thing you're referring to though. ;) -Dave (23 years ago, 5-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) <snipped LAST year's list> (...) For THIS year's list, compiled by Dan Boger (not cumulative, but only for 2001), see (URL) C. (23 years ago, 12-Jan-02, to lugnet.people)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Benjamin Medinets writes: <huge snip> (...) as it was pointed out by others, that was last years list (from 2000). But please try to trim the quotes - there was no need to quote 2056 lines just to add 2 lines, right? :) Dan (23 years ago, 14-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		Re: Top 1000 noisemakers (was: Re: Posting frequency?)
(...) well, right now your headers show: X-Real-Life-Name: Ed Jones but I guess at some point they has the "Boxer" version? if it's important, I can try to dig up which posts show the "Boxer"... LMK :) Dan (22 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

		IR (formally 6.8nF cap)
I have asked for confirmation as to which frequency (38 or 40 KHz) is correct. As my current components should give me a frequency of 39KHz (1/3.883KOhm*6.6nF) I should be able to use either with out to much problem. I am thinking of using the (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)

frequency
(score: 1.983)

More: Next Page >>