|
 | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| Actually, I was thinking of CERTIFY, like a enable of the specific new metacommands. Example: If you have a 0 CERTIFY BFC would mean Enable or take into account the GFC related commands. besides the fact that it certifies that file has beeing (...) (25 years ago, 16-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|  
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| (...) I forgot to add that you can have a file that is 'certified', but due to its nature (the lego part/sub-part) no clipping is applicable, but it can have correct point order (no bowties) and a defined winding (the default, or some expecifically (...) (25 years ago, 16-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| (...) I do, it's because of those cases like an hollow cylindir DAT file is referenced by another DAT file. Since the cylinder is supposed to be define outwards, but you can use it to make the inside/outside of a stud (for example) and the if the (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Making Ldraw Parts
|
| (...) This made me go look at the FAQ, and I found the following inconsistencies in the FAQ. in Topic "LINE TYPES" we have (the FAQ has): (...) which I think its wrong in the line starting with "5: Draw ...." and further ahead in the FAQ (section (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Ldlite for OpenGL and Linux (and uppercase filenames)
|
| (...) I haven't looked at your port of the source, but I would like to mention that you should use GLUT, to make your effort available to other platforms, other than linux, eventually have the same version for windows/Linux. I should warn you that (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Ldlite for OpenGL and Linux (and uppercase filenames)
|
| (...) Why don't we just define filenames are case-sensitive, and allow for an option to treat them differently (case-insensitive) if someone requires it ? we should look in to the future, every OS will tend to be case-sensitive, windows hasn't made (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Ldlite for OpenGL and Linux (and uppercase filenames)
|
| (...) So this is not a problem, just change the primitive file "stud.dat" to "stud.DAT" (according to what I have previously proposed), and if the user wants (or not) to draw the studs, he will change the "line for stud" option of Ledit. P.S. Just (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Ldlite for OpenGL and Linux (and uppercase filenames)
|
| (...) I meant exactly CASE-SENSITIVE. and by case-sensitive I mean "model.dat" is different from "Model.dat". And why can't we choose between ? It's a lot easyer to convert from a case-sensitive complient filename to case-INsensitive than the other (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Part number for crystal in Rock Raider sets?
|
| (...) You should ask that to Lego. ;) We try to follow the Lego numbering scheme as far as known. As far as CAD is concerned there is no need for a different part, it's just a matter of changing the colour properties. Rui Martins (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: stl2dat conversion tool beta2
|
| (...) GREAT TOOL ! I haven't had time to check if the stl supports NURBS, or is it just a normal poligon based format ? I have currently the TECHNIC Tire and Wheel done, the ones that came with the 8880 Super Car model (without the lines/optional (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Link to Sandcrawler pic?
|
| (...) As a matter of fact, I had, and I hope TLC does too before they release this beauty! Hopefully with a score of Jawas and assorted "droid parts!" Kevin (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Link to Sandcrawler pic?
|
| I like the gray tie fighter in the second picture - looks small, though.... and some of the snowspeeder proto's, too... when is the star destroyer coming out? :) and the sandcrawler? EC (25 years ago, 11-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Link to Sandcrawler pic?
|
| (...) every (...) Agreed. TLC *has* to make Jawas at a smaller size than the standard figs. I've made some Jawas using the Obi-Wan hood & cape, an all-black head piece with yellow paint for eyes, on a brown torso (I removed the paint w/brasso from (...) (25 years ago, 11-Feb-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
