Results 6761 – 6780 of about 86000.
|
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | RE: Suppliers and rf link
|
| (...) As someone mentioned earlier (and I can attest to the accuracy) www.bgmicro.com sells the 68HC11 for something like $6 to $8. I bought two and they arrived in only a few days. john calhoun- (26 years ago, 11-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| |
|  
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | [Fwd: 19200 serial link / IC site]
|
| (...) Glad you brought that up. I would, of course, take code for the miniboard, fingerboard, etc. I use the F1 board myself. There are enough people out there who like to port things, anyway. I'll start working on it, but it'll take some time. I've (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Broken Link found.
|
| (...) Thanks, fixed. --Todd p.s. lugnet.admin.statistics is not somewhere I'd expect to look for a message like this. The statistics group is a group that the server posts news statistics in daily. (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Clipping / CCW / CW / INVERT [DAT]
|
| First, let me apologise, if you get this message twice. It seams that the old e-Mail address (L-CAD@LISTSERV.UH.EDU) does not work completelly. Because I got the message back, but couldn't see it in www.lugnet.com/cad/dev note: i am subscribed in (...) (25 years ago, 6-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Clipping / CCW / CW / INVERT
|
| (...) I agree with this. (...) that' wright, a program supporting transparent colors correctly (using alpha blending) would do this just wright. A 3D card here would do wounders ! (did I spell that wright?) (...) Agreeing again! Rui Martins (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Comprehensive meta-command list
|
| (...) I think that the ideia here is: - Assume any file you reference as CCW WINDING (assuming CCW as default) - Assume any file as it's polygonal faces facing outward (if applicable) - Every time you want a diferent orientation, just use the INVERT (...) (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Clipping / CCW / CW / INVERT
|
| (...) I don't need the WINDING UNKNOWN, since it's redundant with CLIPPING OFF. When clipping is OFF you don't care the state of the winding. I am curious, what is CLIPPING -1 ? an UNKNOWN, CLIPPING when not found is assumed as OFF (the safe side), (...) (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
| (...) In fact you can, use as many as you like, but that it's not the goal. if you read my previous mail, following this one I'am replying, you got the ideia that no WINDING meta command is the ideia, if the .DAT is well optimized. If someone want's (...) (25 years ago, 18-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Object Orientation & DAT files & CLIPPING/WINDING
|
| FIRST OF ALL my sugestion is that the CLIPPING, WINDING, INVERT are strictly local where they are used. CLIPPING is strictly local WINDING is strictly local INVERT is strictly local INVERT only means see referenced file as inverted. if INVERT is (...) (25 years ago, 18-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
| (...) NO, I said that, to be used when optimizing the existent files, not when rendering the optimized files. (...) I never said that ! (...) I think that depends on the host processor that you have and your specific graphics board (2D/3D) ;) (...) (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
| (...) By candidate, I meant, someone could optiomize it, a place a 0 CLIPPING ON meta-command on it, and get some benefit. If you use enable clipping, but you have no graphic primitives in your file (assuming clipping is stryctly local), than you (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
| (...) That can be done, but you will probably suffer a performance hit, because, most hardware, just use a bit, to keep track of the state. Just minimize the use of the 0 CCW and 0 CW meta-commands, to boost performance. When optimizing existent or (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
| (...) Great ! (...) Don't be pessimistic ! As soon as people see that their models render twice as fast, they will start using the new features. And a utility to make the optimization job easier would make a big difference, to all the lazy people ;) (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Object Orientation & DAT files & CLIPPING/WINDING
|
| (...) If by default you always use the same winding, then you can know the orientation of the polygon on the fly. IF you mix both you will have a hard time, because you are mixing or reference. (...) That I agree! but my NOTE (suggestion) to pair (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
| (...) This is a problem of the current design (the one beeing used now). You didn't knew in the past, because you didn't have the 0 INVERT meta-command. So you can only assume it' NOT inverted. If for some reason, it is inverted, then the old .DAT (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
| (...) Sorry, you are right here. I allways think in some form of winding (CW or CCW) so this one slipped me, once again sorry, you are right. Can't assume nothing. (...) what I said was relative to my way of thinking, without the previous sentence, (...) (25 years ago, 21-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| (...) I haven't had time to reply, hope to have soon. (...) NO ! It's not quite done iet ! 8) (...) Rui Martins (25 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| (...) Agreed, it's logical. Should is too strong ! not like must, but strong anyway. (...) of course, but all files start on one root, if that is no BFC certified, than no acceleration. (...) but a certified part can have sub parts not certified ! (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Line in the Sand [DAT]
|
| (...) Strange sentence, CLIPPING is OFF by default, you can change that by including a CLIPPING ON. And this was not what was beeing discussed. See below. (...) Look at this two trees root root C N / \ / \ C N C N /| |\ /| |\ C N C N C N C N 1 2 3 4 (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
|
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
| (...) ---...--- (...) Don't take this so personally, it's not worth it. I am only trying to contribute to a worthy cause (LEGO). Everyone can have different opinions. I don't need to jump on the other guys traught. Anyway, I apologise if I have (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
link
(score: 1.817)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
