|
| |
|  
beneke
(score: 0.495)
|
|
 | | Re: Rare parts: Small switch yard engine
|
| (...) Hi Thomas, I am convinced you are right. The pictures in the 241 idea book show us definitely pre-production pictures. Therefor they might have used some homebrewd parts for the upcoming 720 baseplate.... I asked for the "view-through" train (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
beneke
(score: 0.495)
|
|
| | Re: Brick versions over the years
|
| The group is far from dead. Maybe no one has an answer, wants to answer, or hasn't read the post yet. The only person that I could think of offhand to answer your question since I can't answer (and probably not alot of people can answer that (...) (19 years ago, 22-Aug-05, to lugnet.parts)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.495)
|
|
| | Re: tank cars
|
| (...) [[SNIP]] (...) Hi Casey, I really love the corrugated design! And similar to James shovel roof design I thought this would be unbuildable in real live... I think these bricks you used are even harder to get in the needed amounts than the (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
beneke
(score: 0.495)
|
|
| | Re: BR 140 Engine
|
| (...) as usual your model sets a high standard in 8+wide building style, and you invented lots of very nifty building details. The roof details are really cool and the SNOTted front without any gaps looks very smooth and nice (I really prefer it (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| |
|
beneke
(score: 0.495)
|
|
| | Re: Best Lego Year of all time?
|
| (...) I think this question has popped up before in some form or another. But it's the fun sort of topic that is always good to revisit. My 2 cents... After some thought, I have concluded that if I could choose only one year, then it would have to (...) (21 years ago, 27-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
legends
(score: 0.495)
|
|
| | Re: An idea concerning the new RC trains and a new RCX
|
| (...) Depends. Infrared is very tricky for mobile systems, and a train out of sight (behind houses, in a hunnel) is dead meat in tems of infrared communication... A simple (still reliable!) Bluetooth system should be in the same price range as a (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.495)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.495)
|
|
| | Re: New LEGO RoboCam'Bot
|
| (...) So I get home the other day, and Sandy's there with a letter from Hydro 1-- "Sorry for the inconvenience, but there will be intermittent power outages on Tuesday. We are upgrading the hardware in the area." Brilliant Eh, so my web server is (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.495)
|
|
| |
|
beneke
(score: 0.495)
|
|
| | Re: My 1000steineland 2003 sneak preview
|
| (...) (URL) (...) Hi Jan-Albert, those cars are great. In the thumbs they look like typical Maerklin models. (URL) See you and the models in 5 days at the show in Berlin! Leg Godt! Ben (21 years ago, 29-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| |
|
beneke
(score: 0.495)
|
|
| | Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
| (...) We can use two polarity reversors to create a three way switch. Set two polarity reversors side by side, linked by an axle. Set it up so that when one reversor is on (no matter the polarity), the other is off. If we drive 9V into both (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.495)
|
|
| | Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
| (...) No, because it's only wrong half the time. HOWEVER, now that I think about it, you could mechanically connect two polarity switches together at the end with the motor. Then, instead of connecting one wire from each of the polarity switches to (...) (19 years ago, 22-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.495)
|
|
| | Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
| (...) Ok, Here's a partial solution (assuming you don't want to mechanically link the ends together). Given: Polarity Switch 1 - rotated forward by Forklift Polarity Switch 2 - rotated forward by crate when it arrives at the end Motor - located by (...) (19 years ago, 22-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.495)
|
|
| | Re: A LEGO double-throw switch?
|
| (...) hmm. At first, I would say "No". When you flip your switches at home, the switches could be in either of two states when the lights are "on". (one up, other down OR one down, other up) However, the LEGO polarity switches don't have to act like (...) (19 years ago, 22-Aug-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.495)
|
|
| |
|
legends
(score: 0.494)
|
|
| |
|
beneke
(score: 0.494)
|
|
| |
|
beneke
(score: 0.494)
|
|
| |
|
beneke
(score: 0.494)
|
|
| |
|
beneke
(score: 0.494)
|
