|
| |
|  
all, rights
(score: 0.907)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.907)
|
|
 | | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) Show me specifically where I said that their comments were politically motivated. I think I specifically said that a) they weren't speaking as Christian leaders, because they have no authority (that I recognize anyway) to speak on behalf of (...) (21 years ago, 12-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.906)
|
|
| | Re: Pruning not good for the trees
|
| I'm not sure where the best place to hang this in the tree is, but here it is. Many people have argued that now that the information about the 2001 sets is openly available, Lugnet should not bow down to TLC's request to remove the information. My (...) (24 years ago, 5-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.906)
|
|
| | Re: Terrorists hate freedom
|
| You know, I had kinda hoped that someone other than John might have spoken up in defence here. Perhaps that they have not is a very good sign. This post is longish, and I do apologise. I don't normally wax quite so lyrical, but it is a deep and (...) (21 years ago, 13-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.906)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.906)
|
|
| | Re: Two ways you can help LUGNET ...
|
| Good idea Tim. The two I can think of right now are: A) Title - World LUG map update/upgrade Purpose - To update the information held on Lugnet relating to AFOL organisations and ensure it can be easily kept up to date Co-ordinator - Todd Lehman (...) (21 years ago, 12-Mar-04, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.905)
|
|
| | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) I do. But you now say "I wouldn't have any idea as to their motivations" (...) It is you who said they were politically motivated, and now say "I wouldn't have any idea as to their motivations"! (...) I'm just not clear on what the threat was. (...) (21 years ago, 12-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.905)
|
|
| | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) Fair enough. (...) Well, it is if the law hasn't even been contested before them yet! There is a process with which they apparently cannot be bothered. (...) Good question. I think he believed that judges would actually uphold the law of the (...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.905)
|
|
| | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) Here is his justification: (URL) I find this so disingenuous! "Pursuant to my sworn duty to uphold the California Constitution, including specifically its equal protection clause..." What about the rest of the CA Constitution? Upholding all of (...) (21 years ago, 10-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.905)
|
|
| | Re: Bad News for Brickbay!?
|
| (...) Actually, they have plenty of legal ground. Again, similarly, I am not a lawyer. (And also a Canadian!) But I have been to lectures about intellectual property, and it is my understanding that trademark infringement is based on similar service (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.brickshops, lugnet.general)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 0.905)
|
|
| | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) Oh. Yeah, I guess it's pretty clear: Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. Well, in that case, I applaud Mayor Newsom for defying a bogus, descriminatory law! (...) Hmm. "Civil Right to marry" might have (...) (21 years ago, 10-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.905)
|
|
| | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) What courage? Newsom hasn't even been arrested for disobeying the law! I think I might come to California and steal your LEGO Pirate collection and expect equal treatment Newsom is getting under the law-- namely the law looking the other way. (...) (21 years ago, 10-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.905)
|
|
| | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) I don't know which leaders you are talking about and even if I did I wouldn't have any idea as to their motivations (unless they so indicated). I come from a traditional that believes that each and every person has direct access to God without (...) (21 years ago, 10-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.905)
|
|
| | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) I'm a little lost on the pronouns here--does "they" refer to the people getting married and/or the people performing/solemnizing those marriages? My understanding is that the DOMA frees states from the obligation to recognize same-sex (...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.905)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.903)
|
|
| | Re: Article text
|
| (...) That's not always true. Ever heard of something called the Law of Supply and Demand? Demand has dropped because all of the people who absolutely had to buy it did. Then the people who kinda had to buy it did. Then the people who sorta wanted (...) (21 years ago, 1-Mar-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.902)
|
|
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.902)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.902)
|
|
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
| <playing devils advocate here> I think the main issue is fantastic resource tho it is, it is still a privately owned website. Despite the huge fan involvement in the site it remains private property. Todd is at total liberty to do as he wishes with (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.build, lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, lugnet.publish, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.trains)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.902)
|
