 | | Re: J-Box?
|
|
(...) Not before me I hope - I haven't even seen it the first time around yet! Ian Bishop, Ayrshire, UK (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: What happened to the early 90's models
|
|
D. Jezek <danjezek@REMOVEaloha.net> wrote in message news:Fo45Jq.9wn@lugnet.com... (...) ones. (...) wants (...) less (...) Model (...) I'd beg to differ with Technic. Some technic has remained unjuniorized, but a lot of it (throwbots, etc) is made (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Robotic Vision (was: Video image analisys)
|
|
I am a proponent for HALCON from mvtec.com. Although I have to admit that I am biased, as I have used HALCON during my thesis, its a very powerful environment. The number of available operators ranges from simple low-level image processing to (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
|
|
(...) Even if you don't know C, NQC is pretty easy to learn. (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: A village challenge and questions ...
|
|
(...) A crossroads may also be the center of town, but that would probably make the town less of the "backwards village" Pawel seems to want. (...) This is highly terrain dependant. Watermills would probably be more likely, as a windmill would (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
|
|
Hi Tobias, If you're a computer programmer, I'd definitly suggest using something other than the RCX Code method of writing programs for the RCX. NQC is a nice environment if you know C. If you know a language that supports ActiveX, you can program (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Interfacing GP2D02 with handyboard
|
|
If you are not conversant in assembly, it will be difficult to obtain code for each individual digital port unless you get someone to write it for you specifically. However, if you switch to GP2D12 sensors, and remove the pullup resistors on the (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
|
|
Hi Tobias, If you're a computer programmer, I'd definitly suggest using something other than the RCX Code method of writing programs for the RCX. NQC is a nice environment if you know C. If you know a language that supports ActiveX, you can program (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: How advanced can RCX programming be?
|
|
(...) Depends how hard you want to work. With LegOS or pbForth, which replace the official firmware, you can program the hardware at the machine level, so you can do very advanced stuff. With NQC (or RoboLab) you're still limited by Lego's firmware, (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Ebay - 6318 - 1843 - 6024 - 8880 - 7850 (names in msg)
|
|
(URL) 6318 Flowers Trees & Fences (THREE COPIES IN ONE AUCTION LOT) Lego 8880 - The Original Supercar - MISB USA Lego 6024 Bandit Ambush - Castle Royal Knights Lego 1843 Spyrius Space & Royal Knight Castle Straight Lego Train Track 4.5V NIB # 7850 (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
