 | | Re: Storylines
|
|
(...) until (...) Me too! It's amazing! I started thinking of my own storyline too... but it's so boring in comparison... (...) I HAVE a digital camera, but I DON'T have the time to build or the web-page to put it in. (...) (probably because trains (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Blue Spears and Samurai swords?
|
|
(...) He doesn't mean the S@H page 32, but the regular catalog. Search for the set numbers and you'll see what he means - those are technic sets, not ninja sets. And they do look cool... -Shiri (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Welcome to the Ohs
|
|
(followups redirected to lugnet.off.topic) (...) (nitpick mode on again.... :) Yes, there was no year 0. Yes, the 21st century does not begin until January 1, 2001. Howeever.... Where in the world did you get the idea that 2000 would be *ANY* part (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Welcome to the Ohs
|
|
Mike Petrucelli wrote in message ... (...) 0000 (...) Logically (...) curiosity, do (...) While I can agree with the thought that we have not yet entered the new millenium, we have definitely left the '90s. Of course on another angle, we almost (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Blue Spears and Samurai swords?
|
|
(...) i haven't seen the actual sets yet, but going by the illustrations in the 2000 colector's guide catalogue, it appears as if: #8511 ~frost~ has a pair of trans lt.blue spears. #6513 ~onyx~ rather than trans red spears, these appear to be trans (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultimate Collector series (different pics)
|
|
(...) Great pictures. The three speeder bike designs really illustrate that Lego made an actual decision not to use SPUD's. *Thank you Lego* JMC (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: New sets, pictures at lego.com
|
|
(...) Just throw in set #4930 for some dwarves. ;) (...) The light-pink fairy in #5823 also has the moon pattern. Can someone tell me *why* they didn't use minifigs for the fairies? These non-poseable SPUDs are terrible! (...) And this fairy has a (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville)
|
| |
| | Re: Blue Spears and Samurai swords?
|
|
Bryan Wong wrote in message ... (...) spears (...) It looks to me like the blue spears in 8511 might even be trans blue... The katanas in 8509 looks like they might be teal. Definitely not black for either of them though. Frank (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | "Just Build" at www.lego.com
|
|
I don't know how long this has been in place, but it's new to me. In the members area under "what's new," there is a live, on-screen brick builder app. It contains many of the elements seen in the LEGO Advent Calendar set. Drag and drop. Two-button (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.announce)
|
| |
| | Re: Question How do we know if Brad is for real?
|
|
(...) I think neither one was childish - Doyle was just checking, while David (I think) was trying to make a point, mainly that you never know anything in this uncertain world, sometimes you just have to believe... (...) And if he is new, so what? (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Blue Spears and Samurai swords?
|
|
(...) Are my eyes wrong too? Because I see blue spears. Just look at what's holding the spears, now that's black. I don't know about the swords, but i do know that I also see red spears, which IMHO I think they're pretty cool. Karl Martinson (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: 5903 Johnny Thunder & Baby-T
|
|
(...) Africa, Dutch, French, and Finnish catalogs. No Americas. But maybe we'll be able to order it through US S@H. -Suz (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.adventurers)
|
| |
| | Re: Building a Mini-fig Army, how much to pay
|
|
(...) I'm in the same boat as you, but at least I have my experience of building up my pirate hoard to guide me. Rule number 1: snag minifig packs when they are on heavy discount while you can. The Fright Knights Minifig pack is about the best way (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | RE: best tape to mark a line on the floor to follow? - friction.jpg [0/1]
|
|
Re: Friction Tape Found the graph, attaching it here as a very small JPEG; hope it's readable, don't want to take up bandwidth. If someone wants a better res. version, email me... (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Question How do we know if Brad is for real?
|
|
Doyle, I think David's point is, how do we know anything with 100% certainty? Without going too deeply into epistimology (we HAVE done just that on off-topic.debate, you could review it if you're interested) I'd claim that we know things in general (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | RE: best tape to mark a line on the floor to follow?
|
|
I did an experiment with my 9 year old Granddaughter on several kinds of tape. NET: "friction tape" is best. This is a tar-black fabric tape that is intended for taping handles of baseball bats, hockey sticks, and other important items. She wrote an (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Dune Sand Roaver
|
|
In lugnet.space, Shawn H. Golley writes: [snip] (...) It's been a REALLY long time, but I got a picture up. the url is: (URL) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Happy New Year!
|
|
Happy 2000 everyone, and may none of your computers go nuts! Our only "glitch" was that the date on our computer showed January 3, 1997 of all dates.. Easily fixed, though. Greg Majewski (URL) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Welcome to the Ohs
|
|
(...) <nitpick mode on> The Year 2000 is the last year of the '90s (not 90's.) There was no year 0000 The first year was 0001. So 0001 to 0010 is the first decade A.D. Logically the last decade of the 20th century is 1991 to 2000. Just out of (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Question How do we know if Brad is for real?
|
|
On Sat, 1 Jan 2000 09:45:23 GMT, "Doyle" <doylenelson@home.com> wrote: [snipped a very witty reply by David Kadansky] (...) And your skepticism was not? (...) I've never encountered David either, on RTL in years past or here on Lugnet. It doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
