 | | My Review of 6474
|
|
This will be my first review. Set 6474 Wheeled Front Shovel Piece count 47 pcs. cost $6.00 The set came with two bags containg seperate instructios.when I put this together I noticed that they used a flat plate for the platform instesd of the one (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Does Anyone Know Where Pix Are? HELP!!!
|
|
(...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: AFOL
|
|
Hmmm.... Aren't teenagers and adolescents one and the same? Anyway, the reason the term AFOL exists is because if one were (at least among the general population) to say that someone is a fan of Lego, it would be assumed that the fan is not an (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: First Lego League Software (fwd)
|
|
Hi. If you are seriously considering using other processors, then this unit is far from being the only possibility. (...) 1) The Stamp microprocessors directly support programming in BASIC. Stamps are widely used in the Sumo Robot community. 2) The (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Arctic Bonus Set 6569
|
|
(...) That's the canonical cannon joke, so don't anyone else tell it here please. As to liking disliking South Park, I'm too old or too smart to like it, not sure which. I just think calling the parka guy Kenny is funny. I don't see that as (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Experimenting with Brasso (tm)
|
|
Is this something that one could mechanise? Ala a buffing wheel or the like. Purely hypotehtical question for me, the thought of actually removing printing (even happy meal printing) makes me blanch, Blanche! (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Pieces suggestions
|
|
Well, despite having just posted that I think we should wait to see what they're looking for, I have to point out that no list is complete without the canonical trainhead wishlist... 1x2x3 windows and their glass... with the train style divider (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | You're welcome for the thanks (was Re: Thanks for the welcome
|
|
Another great missive. Here's my comment. So far we've been all over the map on feedback. No topic is off bounds because, finally, someone actually popped up and said "yes, we want to listen". But too much of a muchness is too much(1)! So to help (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Pirate Gaming
|
|
Mr L F Braun wrote in message <385F388B.AA3ED961@p...su.edu>... (...) piratical (...) "proper" (...) thing I (...) Hm, it's sounding like Virginia would be a reasonably central location that most of us could get to. I really need to start building (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.boats)
|
| |
| | Re: Correct Castle 6098 (not 6091)
|
|
(...) I agree. Although 6085 comes close. Dan (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Colin and Wanda's world tour
|
|
The travellers have just changed posts again and are now in another part of England sharing accommidations with David where they will stay until the New year and then they will make their appearance in the USA, so all the USAer on the list be sure (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Mindstorms spirit.ocx programming = RCX ASM coding? (fwd)
|
|
(...) control-structure. (...) like this: (...) Preprocesors can make things a little less verbose and also assign readable names to constants. However, its quite another thing to convert infix notation to function calls or allocate temporary (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Bulk Pieces suggestions
|
|
Brad- From your latest post I take it that you are soliciting advice as to which bricks should be offered in bulk. Although this topic has been discussed at great length many times and in different NGs, I thought that perhaps it would be good to go (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Mindstorms spirit.ocx programming = RCX ASM coding?
|
|
(...) My biggest gripe about spirit is that it is only available for Win32. If it had also been available on Mac and Linux I would've layered NQC on top of it and never had to create a non "LEGO sanctioned" interface to the RCX. Actually, TLG now (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: AFOL
|
|
(...) I think that was the point... (...) James (URL) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: First Lego League Software (fwd)
|
|
(...) Those points aside, the MIT software actually generates code for the RCX. (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: First Lego League Software (fwd)
|
|
----- Forwarded message from Matthew Miller ----- From: mattdm@mattdm.org (Matthew Miller) Subject: Re: First Lego League Software Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 03:33:31 GMT On a related note: it's really unfortunate that the MIT Logo stuff isn't publicly (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: AFOL
|
|
No way. Fan Of Lego could mean any age. How about TFOL (13-19) for Teenage Fan Of Lego and ADFOL (12 and under) for ADolescent Fan Of Lego. (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2000 Lego in Seattle
|
|
Hi Jeremy, Better yet, Southcenter Zany Brainy has some of the new sets now, here's a list: 7124 Flash Speeder $9.99 7115 Gungan Patrol $12.99 7104 Desert Skiff $5.99 7134 A-wing Fighter $12.99 7180 B-wing at Rebel Control Center $34.99 8000 Pit (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.us.wa)
|
| |
| | Re: First Lego League Software
|
|
(...) Well, not to get into "well, when I was a boy" :) but I was in third grade when I started BASIC programming. I didn't have a computer at home; just access to the one Apple ][+ in my classroom at school. I'm not bragging or anything -- while I (...) (25 years ago, 23-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
