 | | Re: What are the *REAL* Y2K sets?
|
|
(...) Best-Lock, anyone? :) It's a military brick-system coup d'etat (imagine diacritical)! (...) This could improve sales of the LEGO Disassembly Tool That Cannot Be Named™, which, I will point out, has passed all Y2K compliance tests. (...) Y2K (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: What are the *REAL* Y2K sets?
|
|
(...) Cash? Feh. It'll be worthless once everyone tries to yank theirs out. Better to have cigarettes, because you can build an empire of nicotine fiends once they run out and distribution is down! :) As for me, I've joked about putting a 50-lb bag (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Enough already
|
|
(...) I recently placed an order for 10 of one set, and they felt they had to call me the next day to confirm that I really wanted 10 and not 1 (thinking it was a clerical error). -John (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: What are the 10 pieces most in need of coming in 1/2s (was Re: What are the 10 worst pieces ever made by TLG?
|
|
(...) The 33'/45' slope corners, like the yellow ones in the Outback Airstrip (#6444). I would have been able to have a building that has a 45' slope on 2 sides and a 33' slope on the other two, but I can only do it if the building is 4 studs from (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Conidtion of Sets (MIB, MISB)
|
|
(...) This is the rule that I follow. I had a situation just a couple of days ago--one of my sets up for auction, although MIB, wasn't MISB (even though I'd put it down that way). I contacted the buyer immediately and offered to make it up with a (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
