 | | Re: The updated PARTS.LST online?
|
|
(...) Sounds like a good idea. Would /download/updates/ be appropriate for this? And does anyone have a non-butchered current parts.lst (unlike mine) they'd send for this? I'll get it up at least by Thursday, when I update the MOTM voting. -Tim (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Leo's castle-- number mix up?
|
|
An oddity- I was putting away my instructions for my new 2000 sets when I noticed something VERY bizarre! I usually put my instructions in order, so I was putting my Leo's Castle instructions away-- and thinking all this time that it was 6091, I got (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: 2000 sets
|
|
Bones Dragon <necrobones.nospam@i...bones.com> wrote in message news:Fn1nnC.2pG@lugnet.com... (...) It's based on the X-wing and Y-wing, which are considered quite close to scale with the height of a minifig. -John Van (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Enough already
|
|
I said what I said, and I stand by it. The fellow (I have not gone back to look up who it was) who took the tack of "Oh, yeah!?! PROVE it!" came across to me as a moron. I do not say that he is one (although I admit that this is a very small (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Quick 4565 Q
|
|
(...) NO! Thank all lego saints it does not come like the 4560 et al. It predates 4560/1 by quite a while (3 years) and is much better of a set. James Powell (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
