|
|
 | | Re: Language slipping?
|
| (...) EGAD!!! Maybe our Republican Conservative leaders are right! Maybe we are "slouching towards Gomorrah"! :-) <----- (A debauched expression.) Gary Istok (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
| (...) Too true. And in the interest of equality, why don't they make printed muscle-bound males to go with these ambitiously-drawn female figures? How are we supposed to make hulking barbarians? Is this some sort of TLG bias? All in fun, Dave! (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
| (...) But, but, Hollywood says that all people in the middle ages were beautiful. That must make it true! James (URL) not an actor, but I play one on TV..." (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
| I don´t like her torso print. It´s too... well, you probably know what I mean. and lego babes shouldn´t look like that. In Paradisa, none of the girl minifigs looked like that. --Tobias (...) 2000 (...) work (...) to (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Ritocchi al sito ItLUG
|
| (...) Le immagini vanno anche troppo bene complimenti, la cosina un po' bruttina :-) se mi permetti, e' quel frame di cui ti avevo parlato. Ora pero' mi viene un dubbio, non saro' percaso il solo a vederlo ? Io come browser uso netscape 4.6 in (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
Skipped 6 messages in
groups
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek (Skip-filter settings)
|
