To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *80817 (-5)
  Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
 
(...) Or they don't care. Which is what I think. And I'm more than willing to interpret silence that way, just like we've interpreted their silence on other issues that way. (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Dino Island Issues
 
(...) wearing (...) I think the guy on the bridge is a new guy. It doesn't look like Harry is appearing this time around. :( Jeff (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.adventurers)
 
  Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
 
(...) NO. Huw respected Suz's request. There's a big difference. "They" havent' made any such request that I'm aware of. Or if they have, it's been a more general request that several other major fan sites violate every day. (...) If I thought (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
 
(...) Do you have any evidence to support the assertion that TLG/C DOES respect us "much" or at all? I bet for every instance of an _individual_ Lego employee showing respect for another individual AFOL we can come up with at least one example of a (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
 
  vari
 
Tuttitubi etc La mia personale opinione e' che Lego stia cercando di creare nuovi modelli piu' appariscenti esteticamente, con un minor numero di pezzi (diciamo ad essere positivi perche' credono che questo sia il desiderio dei clienti, ad essere (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.it)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR