 | | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
|
Does anyone in the UK have a contact number for Huw? I'm guessing as it's a sunday evening there is a good chance than he won't see this till monday morning. Assuming he agrees then that is a bad thing, assuming he disagrees then it doesn't matter (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
|
Suzanne- I acutally have to disagree with your comment here. If they wanted to keep this information confidential, then they would not have released ANY of the information given to us, by means of a thrid part correspondent, or by someone directly (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
|
(...) Just a clarification here -- Suzanne was not asking me to delete Huw's post; she was asking Huw to ask me to delete his post. Since there is nothing wrong with Huw's post technically (such as a duplicate message or a binary or virus, etc.), I (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Scout memory map and variable extraction
|
|
"Bert van Dam" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message news:000201bf3f00$af...van-dam... (...) which (...) the (...) Hi Bert, I did a program for the Scout (and the MicroScout) using the SDK. Actually, I pushed it to the limit... only seven (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
|
(...) [confidential internal LEGO Company info snipped] (...) Huw, I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that your correspondent (name?) neglected their responsibility to inform you that the information passed along to you was meant (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
