To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 11230
11229  |  11231
Subject: 
Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general
Followup-To: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Sun, 5 Dec 1999 21:34:26 GMT
Viewed: 
1618 times
  
In lugnet.general, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
In lugnet.announce, Huw Millington writes:
[...]
As a truly good intentioned LEGO enthusiast, I am asking you to remove
these illegal scans from internet publication and also ask Todd to delete
your previous post.  [...]

Just a clarification here -- Suzanne was not asking me to delete Huw's post;
she was asking Huw to ask me to delete his post.  Since there is nothing
wrong with Huw's post technically (such as a duplicate message or a binary
or virus, etc.), I can't delete Huw's post without his explicitly asking,
for legal reasons, otherwise it borders on censorship, and LUGNET's policy
is not to censor based on content.  However, if an official from LEGO were
to write and demand that the post be removed on legal grounds (copyright
infringement, publicity rights infringement, etc.), then I could comply.

The best thing (assuming that Huw agrees with Suzanne's opinion) is for Huw
simply to voluntarily cancel his himself, at his own discretion.  Note:
This is NOT a formal administrative request for Huw to cancel his message.

--Todd

[followups to lugnet.admin.general]



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
 
Does anyone in the UK have a contact number for Huw? I'm guessing as it's a sunday evening there is a good chance than he won't see this till monday morning. Assuming he agrees then that is a bad thing, assuming he disagrees then it doesn't matter (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
 
(...) [confidential internal LEGO Company info snipped] (...) Huw, I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that your correspondent (name?) neglected their responsibility to inform you that the information passed along to you was meant (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)

105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR