 | | Re: Functional languages and/or RCX wrapper code
|
|
(...) If Lego keeps doing what they're doing, I suspect 2.0 will be a much more open architecture than 1.0 or 1.5. At the very least they should wind up documenting the RCX at the bytecode level (if they're smart, that is), so that the hacker types (...) (26 years ago, 16-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Line Followers
|
|
(...) That is the method I've usually assumed would be best. (...) Wow. This sounds like a mechanical mess, but an elegant solution (in a broader sense) to the depth/breadth issue I was talking about last night. Good luck. My two cents: 1) maybe a (...) (26 years ago, 16-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: IRPD
|
|
If you check (URL) you will find IRPD's with very narrow detection zones. Those are good for many applications. If you need one with wide coverage just for obstacle avoidance, check (URL) One or the other of those sites should work for you. Gary (...) (26 years ago, 16-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re: Prices of New Star Wars LEGO
|
|
(...) from (...) least (...) Yes, I would have also guessed $50. on the B-Wing, but the $20 Slave I was already confirmed by the mini catalog on birckshelf.com (URL) with all except the B-wing & skiff Ryan (26 years ago, 16-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8?
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:6WswOCJp6IP1cmL...4ax.com... (...) pods. (...) to (...) set, (...) My, aren't we cynical? If they don't put at least a holochess table and a gunner's seat in there, they will have (...) (26 years ago, 16-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
