 | | Re: Bullboys, Moomen, or Longhorns?
|
|
(...) oh, let's rush to judgement. my favorites so far are "cow-pack", and "beef boys". moo-men is really good too. "ox raiders? later ~ craig~ (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Favorite Star Wars Movie Stuff...
|
|
I always preferred the A-Wing in dogfighting for the Alliance. It doesn't have a large weapons array, but it's fast speed and super manueverability always kept me alive the longest. For the Imperial fleet I liked the TIE Defender the best. The (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | What people will buy on ebay...
|
|
Here's a new one at ebay, selling information on where to buy the 8880 for under $125. Unforturately, DYA may be out of stock before the buyers can actually order them. (URL) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Queen Amidala
|
|
(...) Astounding! A masterpiece! (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Could Arctic windows = ATAT windows?
|
|
I wouldn't be surprised if this turns out to be the case. The MF is MUCH smaller than it should be, especially the cockpit. I think it's reasonable to assume the AT-AT will also be scaled down in this way. Dave (...) course (...) actual (...) (give (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Slave 1 Cockpit
|
|
There's also a trans-antifreeze one in Mtron #6956. I really wish they'd make one in trans-green! Opaque blue and white would be great too. Dave Joel Hoornbeek <joel@webaccess.net> wrote in message news:FL1pwF.Bx5@lugnet.com... (...) there (...) (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8?
|
|
No, I think I figured it out. It is a hand. Ever see the CD Lego catalog in the Turbo Command set. This hand comes out and does the stuff to the models to show what it does. I think this hand had some kind of Borg looking contraption on it. The pic (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
Steve: (...) [...] (...) ...with the inversion status. (...) Yes. You might want to change "INVERT" to "INVERTNEXT". Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
[ Still discussing (URL) ] Steve: (...) [...] (...) "INVERTNEXT" is good. It makes the effect much more clear. (...) It gets much too messy when you mix the states of a parameter and the setting of that parameter. CERTIFY BFC does imply CLIPPING ON, (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle
|
|
(...) I think there was a discussion on this a while ago... hmm... Ah yes: (URL) think it seemed that peoples guesses ranged from $200 - $400 depending on who you asked and what the condition of the set was... Think there was some minor bickering on (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
