Subject:
|
Re: Could Arctic windows = ATAT windows?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Nov 1999 18:56:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
725 times
|
| |
|
|
I wouldn't be surprised if this turns out to be the case. The MF is MUCH
smaller than it should be, especially the cockpit. I think it's reasonable
to assume the AT-AT will also be scaled down in this way.
Dave
> > I was thinking the same thing by I think they are a bit to small. Of • course
> > Dave and Shaun would be the best to answer this.
>
> Yep. They look like they're 4 studs wide, which is a bit too narrow. The • actual
> width of the front viewscreen on the AT-AT should be roughly 8 feet wide • (give
> or take a foot) which would be about 7 studs wide in minifig scale. Mine
> AT-AT's viewscreen was 6 studs wide, and I think Shaun's was 8?
>
> But it certainly has the right look to it! It might work for TLG (TLC • now!) if
> they want to make a slightly scaled down version of the AT-AT for a set, • but
> for the "real" thing, it's a bit too narrow.
>
> DaveE
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Could Arctic windows = ATAT windows?
|
| (...) Yep. They look like they're 4 studs wide, which is a bit too narrow. The actual width of the front viewscreen on the AT-AT should be roughly 8 feet wide (give or take a foot) which would be about 7 studs wide in minifig scale. Mine AT-AT's (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
