 | | Re: What might have been...
|
|
(...) Er, my point was that what's happening now is absolutely nothing new. Many people have been disappointed every single year since I can remember (back to about November of 1993). Nothing has changed this year except it sounds this year like the (...) (26 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Highlights
|
|
Hey, not bad. Good use of mostly non-SW parts. Ryan ***...*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***...*** (...) every (...) trying to (...) out my (...) (26 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: What might have been...
|
|
(...) The man makes a point. After seeing the LEGO y2k catalog, the one thing that's been going around and around in my head is the notion that we are getting older -- all of us -- while the average age of TLG's targeted audience is pretty much (...) (26 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Highlights
|
|
(...) I would if you told me where to go. And only if you promice to go to my site and check out my Z-95. :) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=...=-=-=-=-=- jmbrown@mines.edu (URL) (26 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | More castle 2000 set comments
|
|
OK, with all the posts nitpicking the new sets, I though I'd add my .02 cents (making it like $3 laying around now... :) ). 6095: Cool looking training dummy. A king and some kind of boring throne (some nice pieces in it), two knights. Arms totals: (...) (26 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
