 | | Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
|
|
(...) Not alot, really. It was the current theme when I came out of my Dark Ages, and I think it's the best of the last 4 subthemes. That doesn't mean it was as good as some of the earlier subthemes, but it was good. (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Jyst got back from LLW...
|
|
(...) Maybe, but not optimal. I suspect that the rear balcony of Papa Mole's might have been perfect... (...) Yep! $1000 gets them four annual passes for life (whatever that may be), plus other goodies besides... I reckon it to be the equivalent, in (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
|
|
(...) Ok, so you see I wasn't necessarily (or at all, in fact) responding to the alleged "skimpiness" of the new sets. Cool. Give me basic gray bricks, castle walls, and pitchforks and I'll be happy. I'd agree with anyone who felt that FK, DF, and (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
|
|
(...) This is what I responded to. It appears that this person refers Ninja to more traditional Castle subthemes. I still maintain the Ninja subtheme sucks. I don't see how anyone could prefer it to real Castle stuff. (...) Maybe. (...) I didn't (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
|
|
(...) what was wrong with Royal Knights? KL (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
|
