| | Re: What is legos target audience supposed to be?
|
|
What´s an "aflo"? A Freaking Lego Oyster? --Tobias <380D0685.85969621@x...il.com>... (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Busy-Bee has 6347 Monorail Accessory Track!
|
|
My apologies, but what I meant was: Is he requesting special orders from Lego? Is Lego re-running old or discontinued sets for him? I was under the impression that the Maersk truck has been discontinued for some time. If the answer to either of the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: What is legos target audience supposed to be?
|
|
I coul <380de5fc.14811355@l...et.com>... (...) I couldn´t have said it better myself. The prices are high and their web site sucks. But TLG must have realized that, since they recently redesigned their website. Are they really going for the kids, or (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: visit to chicago
|
|
(...) Try FAO Schwartz on Michigan Avenue (I think?) also, you could stop by my place in Wheaton (30 miles west) to visit and see the collection if you like... -Tim <>< (URL) timcourtne ICQ: 23951114 Bumper Sticker: 'I'd punch you in the face, but (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.us.il)
|
|
| | visit to chicago
|
|
Hi to everybody I am an Italian fan of lego that will be in Chicago for about one week at the end of October. Any suggestion about interesting shops to visit in Chicago or around Chicago? Bye Marco (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.us.il)
|
|
| | Re: Which sets had 2x2 INVERSE corner slopes in yellow?
|
|
Thomas P. Rafert wrote in message ... (...) corners. (...) This is correct, this set has two yellow ones. Mike - mike_walsh@mindspring.com (URL) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: My Trading-Page
|
|
(...) out and (...) Oh, that I didn't know, thanks for the hint !!! Cheers Adrian (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
|
| | Re: Object Orientation & DAT files & CLIPPING/WINDING
|
|
(...) Great! (...) It's local when you look at it in the .DAT where it is used. It's effect is NOT local, when you are looking from the renderer program's view, because it has to keep track of the current invert state. The INVERT meta-command only (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Cramped city with a train and a monorail running through it soon. Need some help on how to do this.
|
|
How much clearance does a monorail need? I don't have one yet but I'll be getting one soon. (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.town, lugnet.build, lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: Object Orientation & DAT files & CLIPPING/WINDING
|
|
(...) Yes it is. (...) The reference of the current GLOBAL state is passed down the file-reference tree, YES. (...) Correct. (...) NOT the FILE, but the RENDERING PROGRAM ! (...) Agreed. (...) By default would be CCW. (...) YES and NO. The internal (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: An actual ATAT site!
|
|
(...) my (...) Wahnsinn !! I mean: Mindblowing ! First prize in every category except "under 100 pieces" ;o) What do you say Pat ? Excellent pictures of ___...___ modell (please fill in all the positive adjectives you can think of and than add a (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
|
| | Re: Object Orientation & DAT files & CLIPPING/WINDING
|
|
(...) If by default you always use the same winding, then you can know the orientation of the polygon on the fly. IF you mix both you will have a hard time, because you are mixing or reference. (...) That I agree! but my NOTE (suggestion) to pair (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
|
(...) Great ! (...) Don't be pessimistic ! As soon as people see that their models render twice as fast, they will start using the new features. And a utility to make the optimization job easier would make a big difference, to all the lazy people ;) (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: CyberMaster
|
|
(...) The reason is probably that the CyberMaster unit it not as readily available in the US as in Europe/Oceania. I'd say that the Mindstorms unit it probably the more flexible unit, and probably the most interesting to work with. Fredrik (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
|
(...) That can be done, but you will probably suffer a performance hit, because, most hardware, just use a bit, to keep track of the state. Just minimize the use of the 0 CCW and 0 CW meta-commands, to boost performance. When optimizing existent or (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Could somebody use this program?
|
|
At 07:08 06-10-1999 Wednesday , Michael Lachmann wrote: [...] (...) The firware of the CyberMaster is burned in ROM so you have no way of changing it, and that's also why you can not use the LegOS with it. The firware is a library of routines that (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
|
(...) By candidate, I meant, someone could optiomize it, a place a 0 CLIPPING ON meta-command on it, and get some benefit. If you use enable clipping, but you have no graphic primitives in your file (assuming clipping is stryctly local), than you (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Several replies to CLIPPING / WINDING
|
|
(...) NO, I said that, to be used when optimizing the existent files, not when rendering the optimized files. (...) I never said that ! (...) I think that depends on the host processor that you have and your specific graphics board (2D/3D) ;) (...) (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: CyberMaster
|
|
(...) The CyberMaster has a lot of potential and in fact can do things the RCX is not able to, like to count the rotations of the two internal motors. The problem of the CyberMaster is to harness it's potential, because the software is all about (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: 'Minifig World Tour' i Sverige
|
|
(...) eller (...) Det vet jag. Jag använde ju 3 punkter när jag inte använde 1. --Tobias (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.se)
|