 | | Re: Upcoming _Star Wars_ Mindstorms and Technics Releases
|
|
Actually, SW Technic sets kind of makes sense from a marketing perspective, because it will introduce all of those Star Wars fanatics to ( possibly) a whole new branch of Lego. That is, Technic, instead of System. -Andy Lynch James Brown wrote in (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Wot no RCX power connector?
|
|
(...) Wait a minute... Doesn't the RCX hold its firmware across the auto power down? I thought it did. That being the case, all you'd have to have done was turn it back on, no? -Kekoa (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Wot no RCX power connector?
|
|
(...) I doubt there will be significant changes to the ROM. For starters, if somebody has both an old and a new RCX, try downloading the old firmware into the new RCX. If it works, the ROM interface is the same. If the ROM interface is the same, it (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: AI and even more exiciting stuff
|
|
Ralph Hempel wrote: [ good rebuttal snipped ] (...) Actually, I went through two years of a systems engineering degree. (before finally dropping out) During that time I had many semesters worth of math and CS... however, not one of them went over (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Busy-Bee has 6347 Monorail Accessory Track!
|
|
Hi, If anyone in the US (Tom?) has an extra one or 2 please let me know. Was off-line last week at trade shows. Figures... Thanks, Mark -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...net.com]On Behalf Of Ian Sinclair (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: "Buying Lego" FAQ to link auctions to
|
|
Thanks Jamie, those are good ideas - I'll add them. Kevin (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Wot no RCX power connector?
|
|
What new pieces are there in the RIS 1.5? I don't suppose maybe a second differential gear? No, probably not... Was there anything really glaringly useful? -Andy Lynch Mike Kory wrote in message ... (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Propeller
|
|
(...) There are also the 3 blade propellers used in the various adventurers airplanes, plus the 3 bladed propeller used on the Rock Raiders Tunnel Transport. The 3 bladed adventurers propeller would probably look the best for boat useage. There's (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.boats)
|
| |
| | Re: Object Orientation & DAT files & CLIPPING/WINDING
|
|
(...) <snipped stuff about INVERT> I think we're disagreeing about the meaning of 'strictly local'. As you describe the operation of INVERT, it is *not* local. The state of inversion is passed down the file-reference tree. This is not a local (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Object Orientation & DAT files & CLIPPING/WINDING
|
|
Rui Martins wrote in message ... (...) I concur that WINDING is strictly local. It may be a struggle of words, but I wouldn't call INVERT *local* as it affects the behaviour all tris/quads in *subfiles* And I don't see why clipping should be local. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
