 | | Re: Proposed: A New Kind of Timeline (was Re: The LD environment)
|
|
(...) <SNIP> (...) The downside to this, as I see it, is that everyone would want their own timeline. Is that feasible and reasonable? (...) If memory serves me, what Steve meant(2) was "who will take over ownership of the project?" That is, who (...) (27 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | RTL posting stats (was Re: Lugnet Newsgroups Anniversary!)
|
|
Ok, this is really rough because my comprehension of gnuplot is fairly low, but I thought y'all might be interested in looking anyway. <URL:(URL) is a graph of number of posts per week to rec.toys.lego for as long back as Deja News can remember. (...) (27 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: i wonder if this post will be blown way out of proportion too
|
|
(...) For the most part, I have to agree with you. This should not be a place to ridicule others. However, I don't think that the people responding to your post were necessarily trying to ridicule you so much as trying to help you on how to post (...) (27 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: i wonder if this post will be blown way out of proportion too
|
|
(...) It isn't a matter of being blown out of proportion, really. We're all here for fun, and Lego is a hobby for us (well, more like an obsession, maybe). Because it's a hobby, no one here is getting paid to be nice, or anything, and some people do (...) (27 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO for Life Sweepstakes
|
|
Woohoo! LEGO FOR LIFE!!!!! (...) Awwww..... that's not 'Lego for life! That's only 'Lego for three months'! :) Think if it were REALLY 'Lego for life', and any of US regular LUGNET-ers won, we'd put 'em out of business-- but on the plus side we'd (...) (27 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)
|
