 | | Re: New angled beam
|
|
(...) I realize now that this does probably not look like I intended on the web interface of LUGNET, as it uses a non-equally spaced font. For the benefit of people reading with the web interface, what I really wanted to draw was something very much (...) (27 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone made a soccer field?
|
|
(...) Ovoid, accually. I plan to use lots of green and white plates aranged in step like fashion. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (27 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: New LEGO Corp Websites?
|
|
Well, Medley FL appears to be a small place near Hialeah (Miami). Not even close to Disney World. Hmmm. Ray (...) (27 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sd)
|
| |
| | Re: New angled beam
|
|
(...) No, I would guess they are 135°. (I said 45° in my original post, but I really meant 135°, sorry.) The old part 6629 (nine holes) has a pretty odd angle, 143.13°. (...) Yep, it's the 32140 "five hole one bend" beam, with this basic shape: o + (...) (27 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Will buy 6396
|
|
(...) No. emailing it benefits you and no one else, so I prefer to post the answer... Follow this link: (URL) which you could have find yourself using the LUGNET search facility and the search string "CS IJ". LUGNET has a lot of neat stuff and you (...) (27 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| |
| | Re: So?
|
|
(...) Suzanne is checking the availability of space at MIT. I think she is trying to get us in next Tuesday but nothing is confirmed as of yet. Eric Remove ".nospam" when replying by E-mail The New England LEGO Users Group (URL) (27 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ma.bos)
|
| |
| | Re: New angled beam
|
|
Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote in message news:m33dw8o454.fsf@....uio.no... (...) Yes, sorry. The Droid Development Kit. (...) I have to say that I didn't notice that! I am at work at the moment, but I'll double check the (...) (27 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT format question
|
|
Gary Williams: (...) [...] (...) Then give the user a _choice_ of interface. (...) I would limit command types 2-5 to the "extended interface". (...) The selected object would of cause (imo) always be the level referred directly to by the root level (...) (27 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: S@H Prices
|
|
Just a nit, I agree with the theme of the post, but what you're basically complaining about is the retail prices. S@H prices are (except for specials) basically just a pretty fixed markup (rounded to the nearest quarter(1)) of the suggested (...) (27 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A monument for Datsville [DAT]
|
|
Hello, Oops, I spelled "Datsville" wrong in the file header, sorry for that. Here is teh correct file. (...) Greetings, Manfred Moolhuysen. 0 Datsville Memorial 0 Name: Memorial.dat 0 Author: Manfred Moolhuysen 1999 0 Un-Official Model 0 1 4 -80 -24 (...) (27 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
