|
|
 | | Re: Brickshelf empty?
|
| (...) I'm old fashioned and prefer reading LUGNET through NNTP. It has both positive and negative sides, but one of the major positive sides is that you actually can easily keep track of cross-postings and posts that you have already read. And I (...) (15 years ago, 17-Jul-09, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf empty?
|
| (...) Lately I have been posting a lot more on Eurobricks and a lot less on Lugnet mostly because Eurobricks is a LOT easier to post on than Lugnet (like all the times the authentication email takes forever to arrive or worse still, never gets (...) (15 years ago, 17-Jul-09, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf empty?
|
| (...) I don't believe LUGNET needs to return to what it was to once again be the centre of the LEGO universe. I signed up only relatively recently after reading LUGNET for some years and participating in the robotics section through an external (...) (15 years ago, 17-Jul-09, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: (re)Introducing 62 Bricks
|
| (...) Ease of use, for one thing - there's no need to register to use the site Also, the site is deliberately not meant to be a "community" site - there are no forums or comments. Other sites (like this one) do that well already, but for some this (...) (15 years ago, 17-Jul-09, to lugnet.build.contests, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf empty?
|
| (...) I think part of the reason why things have fragmented such as they have, but not as a conscious decision by any one group or individual, is the lack of redundancy that is Lugnet. There was a period of time many years ago when Lugnet's server (...) (15 years ago, 16-Jul-09, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
Skipped 3 messages in
group
lugnet.admin.statistics (Skip-filter settings)
|
