|
|
 | | Re: Brickshelf empty?
|
| (...) Lately I have been posting a lot more on Eurobricks and a lot less on Lugnet mostly because Eurobricks is a LOT easier to post on than Lugnet (like all the times the authentication email takes forever to arrive or worse still, never gets (...) (15 years ago, 17-Jul-09, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf empty?
|
| (...) I don't believe LUGNET needs to return to what it was to once again be the centre of the LEGO universe. I signed up only relatively recently after reading LUGNET for some years and participating in the robotics section through an external (...) (15 years ago, 17-Jul-09, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: (re)Introducing 62 Bricks
|
| (...) Ease of use, for one thing - there's no need to register to use the site Also, the site is deliberately not meant to be a "community" site - there are no forums or comments. Other sites (like this one) do that well already, but for some this (...) (15 years ago, 17-Jul-09, to lugnet.build.contests, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf empty?
|
| (...) I think part of the reason why things have fragmented such as they have, but not as a conscious decision by any one group or individual, is the lack of redundancy that is Lugnet. There was a period of time many years ago when Lugnet's server (...) (15 years ago, 16-Jul-09, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf empty?
|
| (...) At Brickworld 2009, the fragmentation of the AFOL online community was the subject of several discussions. This fact seems to be well-known to AFOLs at this point. Even the LEGO Community Team knew about this. As you pointed out, one question (...) (15 years ago, 16-Jul-09, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
Skipped 3 messages in
group
lugnet.admin.statistics (Skip-filter settings)
|
