 | | Re: 8275 Bulldozer alternate fix
|
|
I also noticed that clutch gear was rubbing on the beam, but I found that the radial pattern wasn't as bad as the text side. I just pushed it a tiny bit away from the beam and it seems to be working fine. The only mod I've made so far was switching (...) (18 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8275 Bulldozer alternate fix
|
|
(...) I had something else I forgot to mention earlier: one of my 2L notched pins still had a considerable amount of flash that had to be cut off. The tolerances seem slightly off too, some of the longer studless beams take a lot of force to get the (...) (18 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
(...) You're right. My mistake. -Orion (18 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: S@H PAB shipping times
|
|
(...) I emailed them about this order and they replied that there was a technical glitch with it during processing. They apologized and said it should be fulfilled tomorrow or the next day and sent out right after that. Good thing I did ask - here I (...) (18 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.market.shipping, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
(...) I don't know what LEGO color T182 is, but based on Philippe's title, I'm guessing it's the (relatively) new trans orange (non-fluorescent). Assuming this is the case, then color 57 isn't it. --Travis (18 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-fluo trans orange?
|
|
(...) Per the ldconfig.ldr ((URL) file, color 57 is correct. -Orion (18 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
Dean Earley schrieb: (...) Hi, the current 2609 should be renamed to 2609a. cu mikeheide (18 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
Dean Earley schrieb: (...) Hi, maybe this (URL) helps. I only have one part and that has also a groove. On the pictures also only parts with groove are shown. So maybe it has always grooves. cu mikeheide (18 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2609b
|
|
(...) As I'm rewriting 2609 to make use of a load more primitives, is there a version of either of these without the groove? The current LDraw part doesn't but all my real pieces do. (18 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Part 2609b
|
|
Hi all. I have a magnet holder labelled 2609 but is about 4 LDU taller than the current part. Shall I just submit it as 2609b and what needs to be done with the current 2609? Thanks (18 years ago, 29-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
