 | | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) You are right, the main limitation probably comes from wall wart... You are essentially right for the 0.7A current (though it is not hard limit, rather a safety one). Philo (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.robotics.nxt, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
(...) To me, the reasons are mainly "historical": the first way to get better images than the output of Ldraw/MLCad/LeoCAD (which is not that bad for instructions!) was POV-Ray. L3PAO then LPub did a lot to push POV as the renderer of choice. Add to (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What would YOU like to see from TECHNIC?
|
|
Here are a few of my ideas: robotic arm (advanced version of set #8094) carnival rides (set #4957 is a good start) areal cable car (similar to the one in idea book #8889) remote controlled hovercraft (could be moving around on wheels) airplane with (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
(...) A very important point - I didn't even noticed that the vehicle roof was grey, not white! (...) That's the main problem of LDD generated instructions: no edges... Philo (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What would YOU like to see from TECHNIC?
|
|
(...) Hi Kelly, thanks for dropping in. I didn't vote becasue i would buy anything. I deliberate on aspects such as parts and colour availability but the end result is a purchase. Even if it contains blue axle pins. I think you should produce all (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: ARM Assembly Language Programming on NXT?
|
|
(...) Thanks for the tip. I glanced at (URL) previously but I must've missed it thinking it's Java based. (...) Are you referring to the default NXT firmware or the LEJOS NXJ/OSEK firmware? (...) You're right, I've come across several ARM-based SBC (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
(...) It'll be there in the next release. (...) Actually, if you look you will see that parts of it are somewhat transparent (like the left edge of the windscreen). All of it that has the background visible through transparent parts is supposed to (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | peeron inventory corrections
|
|
Oct 8 1786-1: Jailbreak Joe 4865 Black Panel 1 x 2 x 1 should be 0 not 2 4865 TrLtBlue Panel 1 x 2 x 1 should be 0 not 1 missing from the inventory: 4864a Panel 1x2x2 with Solid Studs Black/2 Trlite Blue/1 3176 Plate 3x2 with Hole Black/1 3666 White (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Five micro skyscrapers
|
|
I really like how you built the (URL) St. Louis Arch> with all regular slopes. It's a pity that LEGO has never made a 65° inverted slope. David (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
(...) I would choose LDView over POV-Ray and L3P in an instant if the -SaveAlpha option worked on my Mac. Otherwise, I think your conclusions about the appearance settings are correct. LDView renderings like your example look great. Would it make (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: ARM Assembly Language Programming on NXT?
|
|
(...) Thanks Dick for intruducing LEJOS OSEK, When we develolped LEJOS OSEK, Prof. Mizuno wrote several GCC assembly code to port TOPPERS OSEK (an open source OSEK OS) to NXT. Whole assembly code(*.S) is stored in lejos_osek\toppers_o...1sam7s-gnu (...) (17 years ago, 9-Oct-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking)
|
| |
| | Re: Power Functions presentation
|
|
(...) Hi Philo, Thanks for updating your site. It is a great resource! I was wondering if you have any data on the IR receivers that come with the power functions in terms of current handling capacity (for example, is it OK to wire multiple XL (...) (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
--snip-- (...) --snip-- (...) Is it that they prefer POV-Ray or that they don't have/aren't aware that the latest versions of LPub can use LDView? Although I consider myself quite a dab hand at POV-Ray I would never use it for instructions now that (...) (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | In This Film Industry It Really Helps To Be a Blockhead
|
|
Young Cineastes Find Lego A Congenial Medium For the Age of YouTube This article made the front page of the Journal on Saturday, October 6th: (URL) the growing presence of Lego movies on YouTube and on Brickfilms.com, and the ease with which (...) (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Re: What would YOU like to see from TECHNIC?
|
|
(...) Great idea! You could even go for an unusual loco, like a (URL) Hagan's linkage>. ROSCO (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) The Australian LEGO wall wart is marked 10V @ 7VA on the secondary. I don't recall all the stuff I learnt about the relationship between VA and W, but that seems to me to indicate about 0.7A. I believe this generally reduces as load increases, (...) (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.robotics.nxt, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
(...) I did some research on this several years ago. At the time it was to pursue the idea of wider radii curves. But now it's of even more interest with the 9v track going away. I drew up several different ideas, and even contacted someone in a (...) (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Museo Zagarolo: elenco teche
|
|
Al seguente indirizzo trovate l'elenco delle teche disponibili: (URL) (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Museo Zagarolo: mappa
|
|
Al seguente indirizzo potete trovare la mappa del museo: (URL) sale in azzurro sono quelle destinate alla nostra manifestazione. Ciao Marco (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Museo Zagarolo: foto sale
|
|
Al seguente indirizzo trovate alcune foto delle sale, tenete presente che non fanno assolutamente giustizia al Museo. Purtroppo sono tutto fuorchè un fotografo. Si dovrebbe però capire la natura delle teche disponibili. (URL) foto è dedicata a un (...) (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
