 | | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
(...) I agree communities should choose who represents them. But if it was based on a voting system imagine what would happen; Would people start going to forums and campaigning-- or worse, mudslinging to get votes? I can see that getting really (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Old lorry
|
|
(...) Yes, I sent you an email (adress as seen here on LUGNET) and added it also to the BS-folder of the model. For anyone, who will have a look at it: it is not meant for an instruction, so the submodels and steps seem to be a little stupid (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.modelteam, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
(...) Let me say that I understand your sentiment and your frustration. My aim here is to outline some of the issues that make it difficult to do what seems obvious. Big part of the secrecy issue is actually figuring out what must be kept secret and (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Sticker Generator for LDRAW / MLCAD
|
|
Sorry that it has taken me so long. In fact, I am still working on creating quadrilaterals and triangles to fill the largest spaces possible. My main hang-ups are: reducing processing time a working point-in-polygon test I have found two different (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
|
|
(...) While I agree and reiterate Dave's points, I think that LEGO sees the ambassador program a bit differently. They are not LEGO employees assigned as ambassadors to the AFOL community. I believe LEGO sees them as AFOL members assigned as (...) (19 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
|
